From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:10:55 -0000 Subject: [patch v2 2/3] arm: pmu: allow platform specifc irq enable/disable handling In-Reply-To: <1299063420-22203-3-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> References: <1299063420-22203-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <1299063420-22203-3-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> Message-ID: <001001cbd8d2$e25c9080$a715b180$@deacon@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, > -----Original Message----- > From: tom.leiming at gmail.com [mailto:tom.leiming at gmail.com] > Sent: 02 March 2011 10:57 > To: linux at arm.linux.org.uk > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Will Deacon; Ming Lei > Subject: [patch v2 2/3] arm: pmu: allow platform specifc irq enable/disable handling > > From: Ming Lei > > This patch introduces .enable_irq and .disable_irq into > struct arm_pmu_platdata, so platform specific irq enablement > can be handled after request_irq, and platform specific irq > disablement can be handled before free_irq. > > This patch is for support of pmu irq routed from CTI on omap4. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 15 ++++++++++++--- > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) [...] Looks good to me. Unfortunately, I don't have an OMAP4 to test this on (contributions welcome :) so I've just eyeballed the code: Reviewed-by: Will Deacon You'll need to wait for the ux500 stuff to be merged before you can get this upstream (Linus W is handling the pull request afaik). Will