From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B6CCA1002 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:21:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:Cc :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=iSP1hOZ0AsVWU04bWbtB20mHDgaN9TSqIhbjaBRHRyQ=; b=d8hOY+2EhzRgYLk2Vig+doq470 lWP3KI42GjJcLKE0VOB1XxLva+fgxjOAhK9CUX1UJtaKSlQLFQJc+KM/rIpbCU58rG8/LWdS6krQ4 Wtwo58+J6CG2TpzuiLdG5WxOvrIsUuM0kGkALeKrQiesdIR/IQBYaAGfpwdBizVIaqf3UkXBExPJV lv5TLfGk81Z7RAvck28doYbarV5U4DhcMqc2YFxDacRyKf01+k6Za4fvCIFrKBkFmCLvRHGb4rHJm 3PJ44eCi53kHZrpdwKMO9bgy7uwYL0Yc9+5hfTDmZ9AosMKaFgwOzwQuyJDuaRWuV3UlwsScAnx/W ePf1niSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uu82K-0000000BBOn-3Mlp; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 11:21:53 +0000 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uu76e-0000000ArZ9-1lSG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:22:18 +0000 Received: from epcas5p3.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.41]) by mailout1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20250904102204epoutp01953eb075e35f1964a7f1efcc3d332763~iDTShEN8L3175531755epoutp01g for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:22:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout1.samsung.com 20250904102204epoutp01953eb075e35f1964a7f1efcc3d332763~iDTShEN8L3175531755epoutp01g DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1756981324; bh=iSP1hOZ0AsVWU04bWbtB20mHDgaN9TSqIhbjaBRHRyQ=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:References:From; b=dtC4k+ROPg66f9lY1NsNI0wkpkKWkj1gTW5yRJduCxfBnOEsKH4wmdjUM/PyQn0SO vEUC1TELplS2e5ut9rgeOU523Cht2Yp5bREFpQXb0+FMVgIWIPVjLC75CGrg0FBDCw 31FxD3UbtbGr3e9BLqrEgmgvP3KJ4K+ypQOG8iB4= Received: from epsnrtp01.localdomain (unknown [182.195.42.153]) by epcas5p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPS id 20250904102203epcas5p2b0df51eeea6ec050252650f41b15b480~iDTR7ag6b1396913969epcas5p2r; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:22:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epcas5p4.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.38.93]) by epsnrtp01.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cHbBL4fQ3z6B9m4; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:22:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epsmtip1.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.34.30]) by epcas5p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20250904102201epcas5p2b0faaa8e8b9f42d99b4cfe51b76ad30b~iDTQVvWuh0469504695epcas5p2e; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from INBRO001840 (unknown [107.122.3.105]) by epsmtip1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20250904102158epsmtip1ead7e955e4664fff710c39fa1f568ca0~iDTNWxioq1828118281epsmtip1H; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:21:58 +0000 (GMT) From: "Pritam Manohar Sutar" To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , In-Reply-To: <87857202-b436-4476-9384-67566126d844@kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:51:57 +0530 Message-ID: <001001dc1d85$c0d56a60$42803f20$@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIRMOVGdWg5oRjNsRBgEjzIeIB8IgGabj6EAmTXuDcB8lF0oAGjtHpaA19Hw4WzwQPd4A== Content-Language: en-in X-CMS-MailID: 20250904102201epcas5p2b0faaa8e8b9f42d99b4cfe51b76ad30b X-Msg-Generator: CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" CMS-TYPE: 105P cpgsPolicy: CPGSC10-542,Y X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CMS-RootMailID: 20250903072936epcas5p4a28d0e63c7f0792b516b0cbc68bf3a8e References: <20250903073827.3015662-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> <20250903073827.3015662-2-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> <20250904-interesting-lovely-ringtail-38bbef@kuoka> <000001dc1d70$aebf7d80$0c3e7880$@samsung.com> <87857202-b436-4476-9384-67566126d844@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250904_032216_767121_2C0B73DB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.07 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Krzysztof, > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM > To: Pritam Manohar Sutar > Cc: vkoul=40kernel.org; kishon=40kernel.org; robh=40kernel.org; > krzk+dt=40kernel.org; conor+dt=40kernel.org; alim.akhtar=40samsung.com; > andre.draszik=40linaro.org; peter.griffin=40linaro.org; kauschluss=40disr= oot.org; > ivo.ivanov.ivanov1=40gmail.com; igor.belwon=40mentallysanemainliners.org; > m.szyprowski=40samsung.com; s.nawrocki=40samsung.com; linux- > phy=40lists.infradead.org; devicetree=40vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel=40vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel=40lists.infradead.org; linux-s= amsung- > soc=40vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila=40samsung.com; dev.tailor=40samsung.com; > faraz.ata=40samsung.com; muhammed.ali=40samsung.com; > selvarasu.g=40samsung.com > Subject: Re: =5BPATCH v8 1/6=5D dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: a= dd > ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible >=20 > On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM > >> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar > >> Cc: vkoul=40kernel.org; kishon=40kernel.org; robh=40kernel.org; > >> krzk+dt=40kernel.org; conor+dt=40kernel.org; alim.akhtar=40samsung.com= ; > >> andre.draszik=40linaro.org; peter.griffin=40linaro.org; > >> kauschluss=40disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1=40gmail.com; > >> igor.belwon=40mentallysanemainliners.org; > >> m.szyprowski=40samsung.com; s.nawrocki=40samsung.com; linux- > >> phy=40lists.infradead.org; devicetree=40vger.kernel.org; linux- > >> kernel=40vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel=40lists.infradead.org; > >> linux-samsung- soc=40vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila=40samsung.com; > >> dev.tailor=40samsung.com; faraz.ata=40samsung.com; > >> muhammed.ali=40samsung.com; selvarasu.g=40samsung.com > >> Subject: Re: =5BPATCH v8 1/6=5D dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy= : > >> add > >> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote: > >>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. > >>> The > >>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so > >>> no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a > >>> dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar > >> > >> You just dropped all tags without explaining why. > > > > Regretted inconvenience. > > > > There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and > > schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5. And > > review for these changes is needed. Hence, removed RB tag in this patc= h-set. > > > > There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux- > phy/000401dc18cd=24ec02a1b0=24c407e510=24=40samsung.com/=23:=7E:text=3DLe= t%20me% > 20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20 > removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch% > 201%20and%203. > > >=20 >=20 > Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags? Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages=20 for patch no 1, 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining=20 schema more than h/w). Changed commit messages of the=20 patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7) as per reference commits and would like=20 to get them reviewed again, so did not add RB for patch 1 and 3, which you had given RB (in v7).=20 Forgot to add these details for dropping the RB tags in changelog.=20 Do I need to send v9 by retaining RB for patch 1 and 3? >=20 > Best regards, > Krzysztof Thank you. Regards, Pritam