From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:29:44 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Remove un-used code In-Reply-To: <20110819045346.GA26979@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1313498488-4296-1-git-send-email-banajit.g@samsung.com> <20110819015955.GA1212@sirena.org.uk> <20110819045346.GA26979@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <001d01cc5e31$00c9dee0$025d9ca0$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:40:29AM +0530, Banajit Goswami wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Mark Brown > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:11:28PM +0530, Banajit Goswami wrote: > > >> Remove un-used backlight code for SMDK6410 board > > > > Is the data actually wrong? ?If not it'd seem better to finish hooking > > > it up properly than to remove it. > > > No, this code is no longer needed, as we are having a common backlight > > infrastructure , which serves the same purpose. > > Ideally your commit log should make this clear - it looks like you're > just deleting unreferenced code. Yes, I agree with your opinion...It was difficult to know why it is un-used code when I applied that. OK, I will amend its commit log in my tree to clear. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.