From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: S5PC210: Set the common L2 cache configurations
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:47:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001f01cb6469$f65aa370$e30fea50$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100930074959.GA11798@july>
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>
> S5PC210 has PL310 1MiB L2 cache.
> It uses the optimized data & tag latency and also enable the prefetch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c
> index e5b261a..b50312e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
>
> #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> +#include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
>
> #include <plat/cpu.h>
> #include <plat/clock.h>
> @@ -121,6 +122,24 @@ static int __init s5pv310_core_init(void)
>
> core_initcall(s5pv310_core_init);
>
> +static int __init s5pv310_init_cache(void)
It would be helpful that could use more detailed function name like
s5pv310_l2x0_cache_init().
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
> + void __iomem *p = S5P_VA_L2CC;
> +
> + /* TAG, Data latency control */
> + writel(0x110, p + L2X0_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL);
> + writel(0x110, p + L2X0_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL);
I still thinking, __raw_writel is more suitable here...
Because no need to add barriers between each write here.
> +
> + /* L2 cache prefetch control */
> + writel(0x30000007, p + L2X0_PREFETCH_CTRL);
> +
> + l2x0_init(p, 0x3C070001, 0xC200FFFF);
0x7C070001 is better...or should be?...because it is for early write
response.
I think need it for optimization...so please change it.
And it'd better if you could add PL310(L2 cache controller) power control
here.
It can help to reduce power consumption.
> +#endif
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(s5pv310_init_cache);
> +
And in my opinion, following format is better even if do not consider the
coding-style.
Because if not defined CACHE_L2X0, no need to add empty function into
early_initcall().
#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
static int __init s5pv310_l2x0_cache_init(void)
{
/* */
return 0;
}
early_initcall(s5p_l2x0_cache_init);
#endif
> int __init s5pv310_init(void)
> {
> printk(KERN_INFO "S5PV310: Initializing architecture\n");
> --
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-30 7:49 [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: S5PC210: Set the common L2 cache configurations Kyungmin Park
2010-10-05 8:47 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2010-10-05 9:06 ` Kyungmin Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001f01cb6469$f65aa370$e30fea50$%kim@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox