From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-oxnas@groups.io, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/versatile-fpga: Handle chained IRQs properly
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:11:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002b72cab9896fa5ac76a52e0cb503ff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdb90bd8-ede1-63d5-816c-57f6bf0417a4@gorani.run>
On 2020-03-18 18:20, Sungbo Eo wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2020-03-19 02:48, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Sungbo,
>>
>> On 2020-03-18 17:09, Sungbo Eo wrote:
>>> Enclose the chained handler with chained_irq_{enter,exit}(), so that
>>> the
>>> muxed interrupts get properly acked.
>>>
>>> This patch also fixes a reboot bug on OX820 SoC, where the jiffies
>>> timer
>>> interrupt is never acked. The kernel waits a clock tick forever in
>>> calibrate_delay_converge(), which leads to a boot hang.
>>
>> Nice catch.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run>
>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-versatile-fpga.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-versatile-fpga.c
>>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-versatile-fpga.c
>>> index 928858dada75..08faab2fec3e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-versatile-fpga.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-versatile-fpga.c
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>>> #include <linux/io.h>
>>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>>> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>>> #include <linux/irqchip/versatile-fpga.h>
>>> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>> @@ -68,12 +69,15 @@ static void fpga_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
>>>
>>> static void fpga_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc)
>>> {
>>> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>>> struct fpga_irq_data *f = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>>> u32 status = readl(f->base + IRQ_STATUS);
>>>
>>> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>>> +
>>
>> It's probably not a big deal, but I'm not fond of starting talking to
>> the muxing irqchip before having done the chained_irq_enter() call.
>>
>> Moving that read here would probably be safer.
>
> Oops, I missed it. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
>>
>>> if (status == 0) {
>>> do_bad_IRQ(desc);
>>> - return;
>>> + goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> do {
>>> @@ -82,6 +86,9 @@ static void fpga_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc)
>>> status &= ~(1 << irq);
>>> generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(f->domain, irq));
>>> } while (status);
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>
>> Otherwise looks good. If you send it again with the above fixed
>> and a Fixes: tag, I'll queue it.
>
> It seems the handler had been broken from the very beginning. Could
> you give me a hint on how the tag should be like?
Indeed, it has been broken forever. I'm tempted to say:
Fixes: c41b16f8c9d9d ("ARM: integrator/versatile: consolidate FPGA IRQ
handling code")
even if it probably predates the introduction of the chained_irq_enter()
helpers.
This will ensure this gets backported to older kernels...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-18 17:09 [PATCH] irqchip/versatile-fpga: Handle chained IRQs properly Sungbo Eo
2020-03-18 17:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-18 18:20 ` Sungbo Eo
2020-03-18 19:11 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-03-19 2:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Sungbo Eo
2020-03-19 8:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-27 10:28 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=002b72cab9896fa5ac76a52e0cb503ff@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-oxnas@groups.io \
--cc=mans0n@gorani.run \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).