[PATCH 1/3] s3c64xx: Fix build without SDHCI controllers

[kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyungmin Park [mailto:kyungmin.park at samsung.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 1:35 PM
> To: 'Kukjin Kim'
> Cc: 'Marek Szyprowski'; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; ben-linux at fluff.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] s3c64xx: Fix build without SDHCI controllers
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kukjin Kim [mailto:kgene.kim at samsung.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 12:59 PM
> > To: 'Kyungmin Park'
> > Cc: 'Marek Szyprowski'; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; ben-
> > linux at fluff.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] s3c64xx: Fix build without SDHCI controllers
> >
> > Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> This patch fixes the following compilation problem if only NCP
> > machine
> > > >> is selected:
> > > >>
> > > >> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6410.c: In function ?s3c6410_map_io?:
> > > >> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6410.c:51: error: implicit declaration of
> > function
> > > >> ?s3c6410_default_sdhci2?
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/sdhci.h |    1 +
> > > >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/sdhci.h
> > b/arch/arm/plat-
> > > >> samsung/include/plat/sdhci.h
> > > >> index 13f9fb2..c2044e5 100644
> > > >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/sdhci.h
> > > >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/sdhci.h
> > > >> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static inline void s3c6410_default_sdhci2(void)
> > { }
> > > >>  #else
> > > >>  static inline void s3c6410_default_sdhci0(void) { }
> > > >>  static inline void s3c6410_default_sdhci1(void) { }
> > > >> +static inline void s3c6410_default_sdhci2(void) { }
> > > >>  static inline void s3c6400_default_sdhci0(void) { }
> > > >>  static inline void s3c6400_default_sdhci1(void) { }
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >
> > > > Maybe missed in Maurus' patch 'S3C64XX: add HSMMC2 support'
> > > > commit 92b118f6968ae0788ac659af47b464acd9a754a1
> > >
> > > Which kernel tree do you use?
> > > it's against the latest kernel.
> > >
> > Of course, Linus' 35-rc2.
> 
> We used 63a07cb64ccc3ceae619d3298545d602ab5ecd38
> And there's no s3c6410_default_sdhci2(void) .
> 
Hmm. Maybe some misunderstanding.

I meant maybe Maurus missed when he submitted HSMMC2 support patch.
(it means Marek's patch is correct)
And need 's3c6400_default_sdhci2()' as well as 's36410_default_sdhci2()' in Marek's patch.
So requested to re-submit updated patch.

> 
> > Any problem?
> >
> > > >
> > > > Also need 'static inline s3c6400_default_sdhci2(void) { }'
> > > > Could you re-submit updated patch including s3c6400_default_sdhci2()?
> > > >
> >
> >


Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.