From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.torgue@st.com (Alexandre Torgue) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/9] clk: stm32f4: Update DT bindings documentation In-Reply-To: <20170109193312.GN17126@codeaurora.org> References: <1481638820-29324-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1481638820-29324-2-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <20161222001051.GP8288@codeaurora.org> <20170109193312.GN17126@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <0031c2ec-5fc8-4abf-29ef-5039b0508931@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/09/2017 08:33 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 01/09, Alexandre Torgue wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 12/13, gabriel.fernandez at st.com wrote: >>>> From: Gabriel Fernandez >>>> >>>> Creation of dt include file for specific stm32f4 clocks. >>>> These specific clocks are not derived from system clock (SYSCLOCK) >>>> We should use index 1 to use these clocks in DT. >>>> e.g. <&rcc 1 CLK_LSI> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez >>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring >>>> --- >>> >>> Applied to clk-stm32f4 and merged into clk-next. >>> >> >> I'm preparing pull request branch for STM32 DT part. This patch is >> also requested to build correctly DT patches. Do you know how could >> we synchronize our pull request ? >> > > clk-stm32f4 is stable and not going to be rebased, so you're good > to base patches on it and send it off to arm-soc if the arm-soc > maintainers agree to it. You can also base off an earlier part of > the branch if you only need this first patch for example. > I will base my DT branch from 4.10-rc1 + this commit (seen with Arnd) Thanks