From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:40:21 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 40/54] ARM: Samsung SoCs: irq_data conversion. In-Reply-To: <20101214221055.GA16079@mail.wantstofly.org> References: <20101130134112.GO15575@mail.wantstofly.org> <015801cb92e1$117861b0$34692510$%kim@samsung.com> <20101214221055.GA16079@mail.wantstofly.org> Message-ID: <003201cb9dac$e78fae40$b6af0ac0$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:56:03PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Hi Lennert, > > Hi again, > Hi :-) > > > (Added Mark Brown in Cc) > > > > Looks ok to me but there are some comments. > > > > Firstly, how about to separate this to regarding S3C24XX(mach-s3c24xx and > > plat-s3c24xx), S5P(mach-s5pxxxx and plat-s5p) and plat-samsung? > > (Actually, already applied S3C64XX changes so that we can drop that in your > > patch.) > > > > As you know, I already applied some changes which is from Mark Brown in my > > tree. > > You can find that in > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > > #for-next > > > > So could you please re-work this based on that? > > I've reworked the patch I had in my tree on top of your git tree > (latest commit "Merge branch 'next-s5p64x0' into for-next"), and came > up with the three attached patches. I've incorporated the whitespace > changes you requested, and changed the struct irq_data * variable > names from 'd' to 'data' to match Mark's earlier patches. > Ok...thanks. > Caveat emptor -- uncompiled, and totally untested. > > How's this look? > Looks ok to me ;-) > Feel free to merge this via your tree -- I'll drop the Samsung patch > from my tree then. > Ok...will apply after some tests and if any problems, let you know. Thanks again. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.