From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] sdhci-s3c: Add support no internal clock divider in host controller
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:21:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004601cb5ecd$14b64fb0$3e22ef10$%kim@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006e01cb5ec1$fe00b770$fa022650$%seo@samsung.com>
Jeongbae Seo wrote:
>
> Ben Dooks worte:
> > On 17/09/10 10:45, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > From: Hyuk Lee <hyuk1.lee@samsung.com>
> > >
> > > This patch adds to support no internal clock divider in SDHCI.
> > > The external clock divider can be used to make a proper clock
> > > because SDHCI doesn't support internal clock divider by itself.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hyuk Lee <hyuk1.lee@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeongbae Seo <jeongbae.seo@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 60
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> > > index e6e0438..5ad5ed7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> > > @@ -96,6 +96,13 @@ static unsigned int sdhci_s3c_get_max_clk(struct
> > sdhci_host *host)
> > > unsigned int rate, max;
> > > int clk;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * There is only one clock source(sclk) if there is no clock
> > divider
> > > + * in the host controller
> > > + */
> > > + if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_NONSTANDARD_CLOCK)
> > > + return clk_round_rate(ourhost->clk_bus[2], UINT_MAX);
> >
> > interesting, <linux/clk.h> doesn't have a second parameter to
> > clk_round_rate().
> >
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> When I see clk_round_rate in <linux/clk.h>, which function is defined
> as "long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)" that has two
> parameters.
> Please let me know if you have another meaning for this.
>
> >
> > > /* note, a reset will reset the clock source */
> > >
> > > sdhci_s3c_check_sclk(host);
> > > @@ -130,6 +137,15 @@ static unsigned int
sdhci_s3c_consider_clock(struct
> > sdhci_s3c *ourhost,
> > > if (!clksrc)
> > > return UINT_MAX;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * There is only one clock source(sclk) if there is no clock
> > divider
> > > + * in the host controller
> > > + */
> > > + if (ourhost->host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_NONSTANDARD_CLOCK) {
> > > + rate = clk_round_rate(clksrc, wanted);
> > > + return wanted - rate;
> > > + }
> >
> > Why does this need a quirk, instead of just having one clock available
> > in the list of usable clocks?
> >
>
> The available clock is made by dividing a clock source with a certain
> divider value.
> Most of the host controller has this capability that can divide a clock
what
> we want.
> However, the host controller of both S5PC210 and S5PV310 don't have this
so
> we have to
> Add additional routine to make a proper clock with outland clock divider
> instead of
> Internal clock divider in host controller.
>
Hi Ben,
If any your suggestion in this case, S5PV310/S5PC210 has no clock divider in
the HSMMC IP block, please kindly let me know. Will address comments from
you.
As you know, there are many solution for this...But I'd like to use your
preference in here.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-17 9:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] sdhci-s3c: Add support S5PV310/S5PC210 HSMMC Kukjin Kim
2010-09-17 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sdhci-s3c: Add support additional host capabilities Kukjin Kim
2010-09-17 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sdhci-s3c: Add support no internal clock divider in host controller Kukjin Kim
2010-09-21 0:24 ` Ben Dooks
2010-09-28 4:02 ` Jeongbae Seo
2010-09-28 5:21 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004601cb5ecd$14b64fb0$3e22ef10$%kim@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).