linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sricharan@codeaurora.org (Sricharan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 7/8] arm/arm64: dma-mapping: Call iommu's remove_device callback during device detach
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:46:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <005301d23011$53e74b50$fbb5e1f0$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2873304f-8b2e-b519-b3e6-d2b452b1df60@arm.com>

Hi Robin,

>> dma_deconfigure calls arch_teardown_dma_ops in the device_detach path,
>> which is called when the device gets detached from the driver.
>> When the device was added, iommu's add_device callback was used to
>> add the device in to its iommu_group and setup the device to be ready
>> to use its iommu. Similarly, call remove_device callback to remove the
>> device from the group and reset any other device's iommu configurations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c   | 8 ++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 7 +++++++
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> index b9191f0..cbe22de 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> @@ -2289,11 +2289,19 @@ static bool arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>>  static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev);
>> +	const struct iommu_ops *ops;
>>
>>  	if (!mapping)
>>  		return;
>>
>>  	__arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
>> +
>> +	if (dev->iommu_fwspec) {
>> +		ops = dev->iommu_fwspec->ops;
>> +		if (ops->remove_device)
>> +			ops->remove_device(dev);
>> +	}
>> +
>
>Yuck. It's a little unfortunate that we have to do this at all, but I
>see why. Still, it should be done in common code, not duplicated across
>arch code, not least for symmetry with where the matching add_device
>happened (although I think of_dma_deconfigure() would suffice, I'm not
>sure we really need to add an of_iommu_deconfigure() just for this).
>

 So one way is its already called via a the BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE
 notifier in iommu_bus_notifier. I put it here, one for symmetry and
 another thinking that the remove_device callback should be done
 before the dma_ops is set to NULL. If thats not required then the existing
 iommu_bus_notifier itself can do the cleanup. The corresponding
 add_device in that notifier is dummy now, i will add a patch to remove
 that. If not the whole thing, we can add of_iommu_deconfigure as well.

>It's also broken for IOMMU drivers which rely on the
>of_iommu_configure() mechanism but have not yet been converted to use
>iommu_fwspec (Exynos, MSM, etc.)
>

 I did this, because fwspec was the right way to get ops in the future,
 but yes its getting broken for those which are not converted,
 will have to use dev->bus->iommu_ops in those cases. Will address this
 while changing the above.

Regards,
 Sricharan

 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20161004170414eucas1p141bebe16e1bf241862833e7ad0270c72@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2016-10-04 17:03 ` [PATCH V3 0/8] IOMMU probe deferral support Sricharan R
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 1/8] arm: dma-mapping: Don't override dma_ops in arch_setup_dma_ops() Sricharan R
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 2/8] of: dma: Move range size workaround to of_dma_get_range() Sricharan R
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 3/8] of: dma: Make of_dma_deconfigure() public Sricharan R
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 4/8] drivers: platform: Configure dma operations at probe time Sricharan R
2016-10-26 14:07     ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-26 15:04       ` Sricharan
2016-10-27 10:49         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-11-02  7:05           ` Sricharan
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 5/8] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error Sricharan R
2016-10-26 14:52     ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-27  2:55       ` Sricharan
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 6/8] arm: dma-mapping: Reset the device's dma_ops Sricharan R
2016-10-26 15:07     ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-27  3:37       ` Sricharan
2017-05-23 16:25         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-05-23 16:55           ` Robin Murphy
2017-05-23 17:53             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-05-23 21:46               ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-23 22:42                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-05-24 10:31                   ` Sricharan R
2017-05-24 11:26                     ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-24 11:38                       ` Sricharan R
2017-05-25 15:05                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-05-26  5:18                         ` Sricharan R
2017-05-26 14:04                         ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 7/8] arm/arm64: dma-mapping: Call iommu's remove_device callback during device detach Sricharan R
2016-10-26 15:16     ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-27  5:16       ` Sricharan [this message]
2016-10-04 17:03   ` [PATCH V3 8/8] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops Sricharan R
2016-10-07 15:40     ` Sricharan
2016-10-26 15:34     ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-27  5:19       ` Sricharan
2016-10-10 12:36   ` [PATCH V3 0/8] IOMMU probe deferral support Marek Szyprowski
2016-10-12  6:24     ` Sricharan
2016-10-24  6:34       ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-10-24 12:30         ` Sricharan
2016-10-17  6:58     ` Sricharan
2016-10-17  7:02     ` Sricharan
2016-10-25  6:25   ` Archit Taneja
2016-10-25 14:35   ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-26 14:44     ` Sricharan
2016-10-26 17:14       ` Robin Murphy
2016-10-27  8:37         ` Sricharan
2016-11-03 22:25         ` Sricharan
2016-11-04 15:16         ` Sricharan
2016-11-07 19:13           ` Will Deacon
2016-11-07 19:22           ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-09  6:24             ` Sricharan
2016-11-09 16:59               ` Will Deacon
2016-11-14  3:41             ` Sricharan
2016-11-20 15:11             ` Sricharan
2016-11-23 19:54               ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-24 16:10                 ` Sricharan
2016-11-24 19:11                   ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-28 17:42                     ` Sricharan
2016-11-28 18:13                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-11-30  0:34                         ` Sricharan
2016-11-30 12:07                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='005301d23011$53e74b50$fbb5e1f0$@codeaurora.org' \
    --to=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).