From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jongsun.han@samsung.com (Jongsun Han)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:45:24 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: Samsung: Use the correct I2C2 interrupt
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim2saP2wGxF1U3v-p=PRvqOD+TFJwQ772kt1N-F@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100930044832.GA16905@july>
	<19620.20006.852861.438279@ipc1.ka-ro>
	<AANLkTim2saP2wGxF1U3v-p=PRvqOD+TFJwQ772kt1N-F@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <006a01cb6084$348e9460$9dabbd20$%han@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Lothar Wa?mann <LW@karo-electronics.de>
> wrote:
> > Kyungmin Park writes:
> >> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Use the correct I2C2 interrupt.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> ?arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c | ? ?4 ++--
> >> ?1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c b/arch/arm/plat-
> samsung/dev-i2c2.c
> >> index 07036de..ff4ba69 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/dev-i2c2.c
> >> @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ static struct resource s3c_i2c_resource[] = {
> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> ? ? ? },
> >> ? ? ? [1] = {
> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? .start = IRQ_CAN0,
> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? .end ? = IRQ_CAN0,
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .start = IRQ_IIC2,
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .end ? = IRQ_IIC2,
> >>
> > Is there any reason for using 'IIC' here to refer to 'I2C'?
> 
> Historical reason previous s3c24xx series use this name. I don't want
> to break the s3c24xx series codes.
> Instead I use the I2C after S5P series. I2C3, I2C4 and so on.
> 
> If all person who works on s3c24xx and s5p series agree that use the
> I2C. It can be used.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park

Hi, Kyungmin
IRQ_CAN0 is also used in arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/include/mach/irqs.h

Best Regards
Jongsun Han