From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:10:08 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs In-Reply-To: <20130624190227.20448.68120@quantum> References: <1370943076-13461-1-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com> <1524664.UCV47tfIRU@flatron> <20130621163143.9136.28807@quantum> <51C85F8F.9050501@samsung.com> <20130624190227.20448.68120@quantum> Message-ID: <007001ce7149$1f683f40$5e38bdc0$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39) > > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette > > > > > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine. > > > > > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11. > > Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung > tree. It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register > clocks using common clock framework". > Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree. > And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due > to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours. > > The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be > rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it. > Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree. Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time. - Kukjin