From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA35AC4363D for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB3820758 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kGHeY57z"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Bw2x/kdu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6DB3820758 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=uQGByfZISPTby8CBevZRQY18byyu7zYXixw4xO4F79g=; b=kGHeY57zEUfvQphH2rF0ACYsE x1Yt1Szw/zwLEzGUl7KrGevFMvxduvHMe17KGI7C/vSFBN+nfnEVlgiGiDe0jwdax/Mn3QcOfFzTC xo3scDwfoDdv5IGmZmyyMUNIwK1lLINo2yM5VWlYwEb9lU64VZx4fkVyQhYNNHg/jCOVvV6PD3YZM wCzNHZwlrOvbkVmEwmhgkCCAZCTSYXeIe/zSlBY0x7zpfdEkn+q2Vo0D0t0v4CvYrjjFRaUO9Ryww l8RhajxCZBxA9FEAx8W+kUPxaDOZz9/LZjZmxth1alNqz/eTnWEvGkGqLPF18g+z00kKhNGN8GfBq 5/sVeKVKw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kONd5-0000n6-Dv; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:09:55 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kONd3-0000ma-Hz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:09:54 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 092G9pRN047766; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:09:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1601654991; bh=9xTA5+qh/F+xiW0/+hAkPCcePW2qVrOrlKz6iokDxDk=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Bw2x/kduHCG1sD/TEX34leq45a8x94VRRnmb0qE4raG6ZUYPBtUB489UPUgE/E8gi BqvCgz0GffMF/UomYKNl4SkOQ5yGT7lsnk1xhS+Foj1KrenUyBjDbaDMqSkYZt8CCq Ofki5wc+Ewx8S04QBALC6e6jjmsEwngwHKiAbkyg= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 092G9p2M104454 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:09:51 -0500 Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:09:50 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:09:50 -0500 Received: from [10.250.232.88] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 092G9hwS109185; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:09:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add support for UHS modes in TI's J721e and J7200 boards To: Nishanth Menon References: <20201001190541.6364-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20201001191302.dlp2tzbvkk35vzgd@akan> <2a7ceab9-37ec-9117-1d98-9f307b4b5390@ti.com> <20201002124926.rr5dk5hhygavgqs3@akan> From: Faiz Abbas Message-ID: <00746c65-d240-e7e9-810d-b6e33655cc57@ti.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:39:41 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201002124926.rr5dk5hhygavgqs3@akan> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201002_120953_699890_B3BC80ED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Nishanth, On 02/10/20 6:19 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 10:14-20201002, Faiz Abbas wrote: >> Hi Nishanth, >> >> On 02/10/20 12:43 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 00:35-20201002, Faiz Abbas wrote: >>>> The following patches add support for UHS modes for TI's j721e and j7200 >>>> boards. >>>> >>>> Patches 1-3 add support for gpios to j7200-evm >>>> >>>> Patches 4-6 add support for voltage regulators for required by the >>>> SD card in both devices as well as enable UHS modes at 1.8V >>>> >>>> Patches 5-6 add some required configs to the arm64 defconfig. >>>> >>>> This series depends on driver patches adding tuning support here: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200923105206.7988-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com/ >>>> >>>> Faiz Abbas (8): >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add gpio nodes in main domain >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Add gpio nodes in wakeup domain >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-common-proc-board: Disable unused gpio >>>> modules >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add output tap delay values >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support SD card UHS >>>> modes >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-common-proc-board: Add support SD card UHS >>>> modes >>> >>> Split these up please! >> >> Into SD card UHS and gpio series? >> >>>> arm64: defconfig: Enable OMAP I2C driver >>>> arm64: defconfig: Enable DAVINCI_GPIO driver >>>> >>> >>> defconfig patches can be posted independent of dts patches, they go to >>> different branches. >> >> I was trying to follow Arnd's advice here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a1JpCCCV-CVQj3+eMfWF+=4AuHPpv390Tyj2pKn63_ZVg@mail.gmail.com/ >> >> He says that defconfig patches can be sent at the same time as dts updates and maintainers can send those >> as separate pull requests. > > BTW, [1] your patches 7/8 and 8/8 never hit the mailing list, So, I am > commenting on the defconfig patches without actually seeing the patches, > and solely based on $subject in the cover letter. This is weird. They are there in my patches/ folder and I always do a "git send-email patches/* ..." Not sure why they didn't get sent. My last send-email command does have all the patches being sent: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/VNWsrMcBZd/ > > The reason for my comment was that I think defconfig series could go > independent of the remaining series into 5.10, since they are not > related specifically to this series, they are probably needed even for > am654 and j721e nodes that already exist and was a miss that we didn't > enable. Tying that to this specific series didn't make sense to me. You're right that they are not tied to the series. > > But either way, we are way past rc7. I don't have enough time for > these patches to bake in -next to make it to 5.10 window. So, lets try > reposting this after rc1 tag is done so that I can send the defconfig > (separately for 5.10 window) and the dts staged towards 5.11 (and no, > I don't consider the dts patches as fixes - they are enabling the next > level of functionality). > Ok. I'll send only the defconfig patches in a new series and repost v2 of this at rc1. Thanks, Fai _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel