[PATCH] S5PC110: Add OneNAND interrupt number

[kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)]

Kyungmin Park wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:39 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> To use OneNAND interrupt at drivers, also extend DMA address to cover
fully.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dev-onenand.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s5pv210/dev-onenand.c
> >> index 34997b7..f8ede33 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dev-onenand.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dev-onenand.c
> >> @@ -27,9 +27,14 @@ static struct resource s5pc110_onenand_resources[] =
{
> >> ? ? ? },
> >> ? ? ? [1] = {
> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .start ?= S5PC110_PA_ONENAND_DMA,
> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? .end ? ?= S5PC110_PA_ONENAND_DMA + SZ_2K - 1,
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .end ? ?= S5PC110_PA_ONENAND_DMA + SZ_8K - 1,
> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .flags ?= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> ? ? ? },
> >> + ? ? [2] = {
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .start ?= IRQ_ONENAND_AUDI,
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .end ? ?= IRQ_ONENAND_AUDI,
> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .flags ?= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> >> + ? ? },
> >> ?};
> >
> > You do not expect this to go through the MTD tree, right?
> 
> After this patch, I did a lot of works but failed to persuade the Kukjin.

Maybe I missed this single patch...looks ok itself.

> At this time. it's okay only this patch to mtd tree.
> 
I think, it's better this patch is going to upstream through ARM tree.

Artem, I will apply in my tree. Thanks.

> Kukjin, are you okay?
> Since It's only affect the c110.
> 

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.