From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:00:12 +0900
Subject: S5PC110 should be used the correct VIC number
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikh7mt30gEQU0_Wr7n-jZrG0iUmd1Hw17Ni7UNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikh7mt30gEQU0_Wr7n-jZrG0iUmd1Hw17Ni7UNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <009d01cb2e1a$29605e80$7c211b80$%kim@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Kyungmin Park wrote:
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Can you post the VIC patch from correct VIC number from vic code at
> suspend & resume?
> If not, it has to modify it after release. or can you fix it as below.
> 
Yeah, you're right.

Already reported by Ben Dooks...but missed that.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-June/016872.html

Anyway we need updated for ARCH_S5P6442 which has 3 VICs as well as
ARCH_S5PV210.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> index 0a34c81..0ac3d81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ config ARM_VIC
> 
>  config ARM_VIC_NR
>         int
> +       default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210
>         default 2
>         depends on ARM_VIC
>         help
> 
> I hope anyone should be included at this rc window.
> 
Could you please submit for this?...so I think, Russell can send it to
upstream before 35 stable.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.