From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A88CC388F7 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09157205CB for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="SAD86QwF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FrhFbwdH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 09157205CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WJKOJFQT1Fpm2Jyb2KeX/FjEeBLNuyxZBva65u/lG7A=; b=SAD86QwFEaMW4qZ9FRiA2bBSC nBSpA57aucM58gFbEOkwRZTE6fwvKRC1b450lRBka3aPNIaKo26Qs2AHbInoMCSa8p5uyC+qFSMzK LNZsdOEzFP/0TIIUTqj22weAgeB32K/66mYqdWPtUD76AiKQCRA9jMFFh8AxRfuyzoCIyhP6MTlDo ypIzIUx5mSdLeMLQAq54wyewdYBZDXZLzj1+/q9u7TsHNdIH2li8cNg0cCNeFcN7s5dLK8jaMGVsl sRjgICbzLKdZIOZ4UYtVzFhydG7pOLdprWc59ZJYeJPZ7tAGxYUwcuNV32LKP8XbsCz1WuO6SlsE0 9DmmBoGUg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kcRE9-0007Fu-18; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:50:17 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kcRE5-0007E0-CP; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:50:14 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id p19so1738786wmg.0; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:50:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RI3echpmsILHMbwDzAgMqcqkjUKk2AOhPsGaeepkNKI=; b=FrhFbwdHS6/kq3jq8MO8bIfVNpx/tqWrlhlOsA3bKsZghA74MehbDZoUkpZHwRJM9j 4g0/JpvOD6J4nGOkh8cLPQG8LK5xHzSP2efrQ+y8UBN7JoBdflYvnLUmqWWmaVOa4XZh HJZP5sqeRG/lRZAvH5YMsdwOxr8dsfPsTrSV+0kJVaPP2Ecm08KQRP1Q6QfUI8+E6gRh uxcowjkBfnD69wwWMgU+E9/miAGpncdYoQGEt2jhyNckw77imOXJ9qirusZt4ptHaADF 6SU7wyJzV9+k5IccBZ+nfFT984BpzWZ7p//S+aGMh7NuoIgFqWHshg9WYhW7ahC++LXd yBzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RI3echpmsILHMbwDzAgMqcqkjUKk2AOhPsGaeepkNKI=; b=FjXKO930WpRhAYtcObDSsZ9e6J1Nv7/mT4gkQoO4wgYlUU08F0QwX95fGLJs92rdMV MZS/A4ob52ukBD2vYdo4M9+StWt++wtKbFgOnvmPuAq/fo0CR6GSPe0S0fsPeuAgOgiT w7F+U74p/DIMr4x8HpMrJWnCpMxeubrwfw3Nae/IoBIRwDyeyjLEimc5SDf9OGzMAOIk EyBU1+mCX4Rs+dnj2xruQXUvxC3Orz7KU5tELEyqFYQOMFpFKRBmnqRcrco5zIp4bo1X 0I6cMRygXCGBnGdX19+RL/bDcuZ5PD4KhWvAzybDzpUVnxvRB1BtkOT33KR0g0AmF12d YViQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530S2Vr0gv+EeX+pwpYlPhC5inCWeqzFzgnrepQjFte/gdFx0Hrt RUAtObbZhC/HAdPtpM9wBRE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4aH/axjJpFpDOjbOiN8JuiZiLYbtFxERcm0uuN9Xjc0uKWDIuFz8ESgqBpekhNRBqg9O1LQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9652:: with SMTP id y79mr4175402wmd.71.1605005410743; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziggy.stardust ([213.195.112.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m20sm18743080wrg.81.2020.11.10.02.50.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:50:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fix mtk_clk_register_mux() as static function To: Weiyi Lu , Greg KH References: <1604914627-9203-1-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> <20201109102035.GA1238638@kroah.com> <1604972321.16474.9.camel@mtksdaap41> From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <00a5aabb-b478-66e0-0663-3cf5557e861b@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:50:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1604972321.16474.9.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201110_055013_498374_E854E264 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.29 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Owen Chen , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 10/11/2020 02:38, Weiyi Lu wrote: > On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 11:20 +0100, Greg KH wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:37:07PM +0800, Weiyi Lu wrote: >>> mtk_clk_register_mux() should be a static function >>> >>> Fixes: a3ae549917f16 ("clk: mediatek: Add new clkmux register API") >>> Cc: >> >> Why is this for stable trees? > > Hi Greg, > > My Mistake. Indeed, this is not a bug fix for stable tree. > And there are simple questions. > Will I be allowed to keep the fixes tag in this patch to indicate the > mistakes we made in previous commit if it's not a bug fix for stable > tree? > And all I need to do now is to remove stable tree from cc list. Is it > correct? That's my understanding, yes. Keep fixes tag but delete cc to stable. Regards, Matthias _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel