From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:23:49 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Handle inexact watchpoint addresses In-Reply-To: <20161019120714.GM9193@arm.com> References: <1474643941-109020-1-git-send-email-labath@google.com> <1474643941-109020-2-git-send-email-labath@google.com> <16572d35-bf69-1680-717a-d2815b121c32@redhat.com> <20161019120714.GM9193@arm.com> Message-ID: <00a971a1-983a-b631-a982-ea29e8daa2c9@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Will, On Wednesday 19 October 2016 05:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:45:43AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: >> >> >> On Thursday 13 October 2016 10:33 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: >>>> I think, its easier to go with your implementation. So, I have taken >>>>> your patch and updated my perf/upstream_arm64_devel branch. May be you >>>>> can give it a test for your test cases. >>> I've checked out the new version of your branch, and it works great. >>> I'll write a patch with additional test cases to go on top of your >>> branch, as the tests there do not capture the bug I was fixing. >> >> That would be great. We can send them all together as V2. > > Did you send a v2? I've been holding off reviewing this, but I just want > to make sure I didn't miss the update. I just posted V2. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg537194.html ~Pratyush