Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kyungmin Park]

Dear all,

Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
are merged.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310

I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
status.
I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kukjin Kim]

Kyungmin Park wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
Hi,

> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
> are merged.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
> 
> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
> status.

Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
---
> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
> >
> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
> > board(machine) name?
> 
> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal
board.
> 
Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
also...
So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm
still concerning.
---

> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
> 

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kyungmin Park]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
>> are merged.
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
>>
>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
>> status.
>
> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
> ---
>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
>> >
>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
>> > board(machine) name?
>>
>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal
> board.
>>
> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
> also...
> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm
> still concerning.

No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
concerning. but I can handle it.

> ---
>
>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
>

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kyungmin Park]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
>>> are merged.
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
>>>
>>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
>>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
>>> status.
>>
>> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
>> ---
>>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
>>> >
>>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
>>> > board(machine) name?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
>>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
>>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about universal
>> board.
>>>
>> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
>> also...
>> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and I'm
>> still concerning.
>
> No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
> concerning. but I can handle it.

After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to universal_c210.

Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?

To Russell.
Sorry for bothering you.
Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
universal_c210          MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210     UNIVERSAL_C210

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
>
>> ---
>>
>>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
>>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kgene.
>> --
>> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
>> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>>
>>
>

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kukjin Kim]

Kyungmin Park wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
wrote:
> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
> >>> are merged.
> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
> >>>
> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
> >>> status.
> >>
> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
> >>
> >>
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
> >> ---
> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
> >>> >
> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
> >>> > board(machine) name?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about
universal
> >> board.
> >>>
> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
> >> also...
> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and
I'm
> >> still concerning.
> >
> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
> > concerning. but I can handle it.
> 
Hi,

> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to
universal_c210.
> 
Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long...
If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it
depends on your decision.

> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?
> 
I will apply this with changing it.

> To Russell.
> Sorry for bothering you.
> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
> universal_c210          MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210     UNIVERSAL_C210
> 
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
> >
> >> ---
> >>
> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
> >>>
> >>


Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kyungmin Park]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear all,
>> >>>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
>> >>> are merged.
>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
>> >>>
>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
>> >>> status.
>> >>
>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
>> >>
>> >>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
>> >> ---
>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
>> >>> >
>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
>> >>> > board(machine) name?
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about
> universal
>> >> board.
>> >>>
>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
>> >> also...
>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and
> I'm
>> >> still concerning.
>> >
>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
>> > concerning. but I can handle it.
>>
> Hi,
>
>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to
> universal_c210.
>>
> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long...
> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it
> depends on your decision.

FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it.

>
>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?
>>
> I will apply this with changing it.
Thanks
>
>> To Russell.
>> Sorry for bothering you.
>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
>> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kyungmin Park
>> >
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
>> >>>
>> >>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
>

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kyungmin Park]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
>> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Dear all,
>>> >>>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
>>> >>> are merged.
>>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
>>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
>>> >>> status.
>>> >>
>>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
>>> >> ---
>>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
>>> >>> > board(machine) name?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
>>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
>>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about
>> universal
>>> >> board.
>>> >>>
>>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
>>> >> also...
>>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and
>> I'm
>>> >> still concerning.
>>> >
>>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
>>> > concerning. but I can handle it.
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to
>> universal_c210.
>>>
>> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long...
>> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it
>> depends on your decision.
>
> FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it.
>
>>
>>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?
>>>
>> I will apply this with changing it.
Please modify the machine ID only. I want to use the universal prefix
at variables as is.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> Thanks
>>
>>> To Russell.
>>> Sorry for bothering you.
>>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
>>> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210

>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Kyungmin Park
>>> >
>>> >> ---
>>> >>
>>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
>>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kgene.
>> --
>> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
>> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>>
>>
>

Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kukjin Kim]

Kyungmin Park wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
wrote:
> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Dear all,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required
codes
> >>> >>> are merged.
> >>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
> >>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's
posted
> >>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at
current
> >>> >>> status.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as
the
> >>> >>> > board(machine) name?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at
here.
> >>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
> >>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about
> >> universal
> >>> >> board.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal
board
> >>> >> also...
> >>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal'
here...and
> >> I'm
> >>> >> still concerning.
> >>> >
> >>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
> >>> > concerning. but I can handle it.
> >>>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to
> >> universal_c210.
> >>>
> >> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite
> long...
> >> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it
> >> depends on your decision.
> >
> > FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it.
> >
> >>
> >>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?
> >>>
> >> I will apply this with changing it.
> Please modify the machine ID only. I want to use the universal prefix
> at variables as is.
> 
Ah...just now submitted with changing every stuff...
..ok...will update it ;-)

> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
> > Thanks
> >>
> >>> To Russell.
> >>> Sorry for bothering you.
> >>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
> >>> universal_c210 ? ? ? ? ?MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210 ? ? UNIVERSAL_C210
> 
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> Kyungmin Park
> >>> >
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make
a
> >>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>


Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.