From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:55:31 +0900 Subject: exynos boot falures in linux-next In-Reply-To: <546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk> References: <7hoas54y7k.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <7hlhn9zcse.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <546A83D6.9060504@collabora.co.uk> <7hfvdhyxqi.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <00ae01d00465$10d9edb0$328dc910$@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: + Olof, > Hello Kevin, > Hi, > On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with >>>> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed. >>> >>> I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM >>> problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing >>> it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens. >> >> OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think >> the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted >> out. >> >> Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be >> hiding other problems. >> >> Kevin >> > > Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in linux-next :( > Yeah, it could be a best solution at this moment. Let me revert the commit 0ef76aea7a34 ("ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support") from -next in samsung tree. Thanks, Kukjin