From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 10:08:30 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung Fixes for v3.1-rc7 In-Reply-To: <1642876.jgt6epCtEP@wuerfel> References: <00b101cc738d$bcf46ce0$36dd46a0$%kim@samsung.com> <00cf01cc7466$e2cd66e0$a86834a0$%kim@samsung.com> <20110916134300.GB16280@suse.de> <1642876.jgt6epCtEP@wuerfel> Message-ID: <00d801cc74d6$50d93fa0$f28bbee0$%kim@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 16 September 2011 15:43:00 Greg KH wrote: > > > In this case, I'm not sure which following method is proper... > > > - to send 'pull request' to Greg / stable at kernel.org like bug fix during -rc > > > - to submit each patches with adding 'Cc: stable at kernel.org' again > > > - or ? > > The patches are currently queued in the stable branch of the arm-soc > tree, I haven't forwarded them to Linus yet. I can easily change > the changelog before I actually send them on (if you tell me which ones > they are, or I can pull an updated set of patches to replace them. > Arnd, I think, would be better to me if you could not change the changelog(commit id) because some my topic branch which is for v3.2 has it. > > Are these in Linus's tree already? If so, send me the git commit ids > > and I will add them to the stable kernels. > > > > If not, wait until they are, and then send me the git commit ids, and I > > will then add them. > > This is fine with me as well, but I'm trying to get more people to > send me patches that are annotated already. I forgot to ask during > the last set of bug fixes I forwarded and should probably go through > the ones that are already merged and ask the authors about backporting. > I need to sort out commit ids which are needed to apply in stable among Samsung stuff already in mainline. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.