linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sricharan@codeaurora.org (Sricharan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] arm64: mm: Silently allow devices lacking IOMMU	group
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:49:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00d901d2761a$95903950$c0b0abf0$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66c082c6-da2e-9765-0db8-e0ba2c5bd501@arm.com>

Hi Robin,

>> Consider failure of iommu_get_domain_for_dev() as non-critical and
>> get rid of the warning printout. This allows IOMMU properties to be
>> included in the DTB even though the kernel is configured with
>> CONFIG_IOMMU_API=n or in case a particular IOMMU driver refuses to
>> enable IOMMU support for a certain slave device and returns error
>> from the ->add_device() callback.
>>
>> This is only a cosmetic change that removes console warning printouts.
>
>The warning is there for a reason - at this point, we *expected* the
>device to be using an IOMMU for DMA, so a failure is significant. Rather
>than masking genuine failures in other cases because your case
>deliberately breaks that expectation, simply change the expectation -
>i.e. rather than letting of_xlate() succeed then failing add_device()
>later, reject the of_xlate() call up-front such that the DMA layer never
>gets told about the IOMMU in the first place.
>
>Robin.
>

With the iommu probe deferral patches, this behavior would change
where the arch_setup_dma_ops would never be called if there is
an error from xlate or add_device. But also the error value from
xlate/add_device is returned back and the probe of the device
would fail for any error. So if there can be cases like above, where
the xlate/add_device callbacks can return error for specific reasons,
should only EPROBE_DEFER be considered and rest of the errors
be filtered out with a WARN probably ?

Regards,
 Sricharan


>> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@opensource.se>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c |   10 +++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- 0001/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
>> +++ work/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c	2017-01-23 20:54:40.060607110 +0900
>> @@ -827,11 +827,19 @@ static bool do_iommu_attach(struct devic
>>  	struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
>>
>>  	/*
>> +	 * In case IOMMU support is excluded from the kernel or if the device
>> +	 * is not hooked up to any IOMMU group then be silent and keep the
>> +	 * old dma_ops.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!domain)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/*
>>  	 * If the IOMMU driver has the DMA domain support that we require,
>>  	 * then the IOMMU core will have already configured a group for this
>>  	 * device, and allocated the default domain for that group.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (!domain || iommu_dma_init_domain(domain, dma_base, size, dev)) {
>> +	if (iommu_dma_init_domain(domain, dma_base, size, dev)) {
>>  		pr_warn("Failed to set up IOMMU for device %s; retaining platform DMA ops\n",
>>  			dev_name(dev));
>>  		return false;
>> _______________________________________________
>> iommu mailing list
>> iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>iommu mailing list
>iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 12:11 [PATCH/RFC 0/2] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: IPMMU slave device whitelist Magnus Damm
2017-01-23 12:12 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/2] arm64: mm: Silently allow devices lacking IOMMU group Magnus Damm
2017-01-23 12:34   ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-24  8:19     ` Sricharan [this message]
2017-01-25 10:02     ` Magnus Damm
2017-01-23 12:12 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/2] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Opt-in slave devices based on ES version Magnus Damm
2017-01-23 12:50   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-01-24  9:38     ` Magnus Damm
2017-01-24 10:32       ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00d901d2761a$95903950$c0b0abf0$@codeaurora.org' \
    --to=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).