From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Bui Duc Phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] watchdog: aspeed: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 07:24:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01283c69-d5ca-42b0-a75d-6ebb07fee46a@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAABR9nFcitFyS_xZUkreHWp822iVsoEg6ONFwU9JwPaBqm2MTQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 04:45:07PM +0700, Bui Duc Phuc wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> > >>> + return irq;
> > >>> if (irq > 0) {
> > >>
> > >> This if () is no longer needed.
> > >>
> > >
> > > If we remove the if (irq > 0) check, irq can be -ENXIO and would be
> > > passed to devm_request_irq().
> > > I see that the irq argument of devm_request_irq() is an unsigned int.
> > > Would it be safe to pass -ENXIO to it in this case?
> > >
> > No, sorry, I was wrong.
> >
>
> So this means there are no issues with this patch.
> Patches 2 and 3 have already been applied by you.
> I will temporarily resend only patch 1:
> " watchdog: qcom: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup "
>
Correct. Note that gmail may swallow this reply, claiming that it is spam.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 8:16 [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: qcom: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] watchdog: mediatek: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-09 15:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] watchdog: dw_wdt: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-09 15:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] watchdog: aspeed: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-09 15:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-10 2:38 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-10 3:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-10 9:45 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-10 14:24 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2026-08-10 4:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-08 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: qcom: " Guenter Roeck
2026-08-08 8:59 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-08 14:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-09 10:01 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-09 14:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-10 2:42 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01283c69-d5ca-42b0-a75d-6ebb07fee46a@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox