From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:31:03 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: exynos: pl330: Add #dma-cells for generic dma
 binding support
In-Reply-To: <CAAgF-Bf+rqiFUaBD=aRqry6-2z4o0Ao2L2YRm8bu1x98TfPPyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1362375268-29405-1-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com>
 <201303052237.05910.arnd@arndb.de>
 <CAAgF-Bf+rqiFUaBD=aRqry6-2z4o0Ao2L2YRm8bu1x98TfPPyg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <015901ce1ad3$6ea43540$4bec9fc0$%kim@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Padma Venkat wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Monday 04 March 2013, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
> >>
> >> This patch adds #dma-cells property to PL330 DMA controller
> >> nodes for supporting generic dma dt bindings on samsung exynos
> >> platforms. #dma-channels and #dma-requests are not required now
> >> but added in advance.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@samsung.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > Should we apply these directly to the arm-soc fixes branch, or wait
> > until they come back from the Samsung subarchitecture tree?
> 
> Hmm, If Kukjin can take in 3.9 rc2 it's better to go via Samsung tree.
> 
> Kukjin,
> 
> Can you please take this patch in 3.9 rc2 ?
> 
Sure, I will.

BTW, Arnd, I'm not sure second one(socfpga.dtsi) can be handled in samsung
tree.

Thanks.

- Kukjin