[PATCH V2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add support for clock debugging through debug-fs interface

[kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)]

Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> 
> Hi Mr Kim,
> 
> Thanks for your comments. Please see the inline comments below.
> 
Hi Amit,

I didn't get your updated patch, but it was small things.
So I applied this in my tree for this merge window.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

> On 1 December 2010 13:08, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch adds support for clock information exposed to debug-fs
> > interface.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > Code modified for V2 version are,
> > > a)Inserted the debug-fs code inside macro CONFIG_PM_DEBUG as suggested
by
> > > yong.shen at linaro.org.
> >
> > Could you please let me know why?
> Actually this patch is mostly taken from omap architecture, so using
> this macro in addition
> to CONFIG_DEBUG_FS macro. Also it is better to enable all PM debugging
> features with
> one configuration parameter.
> 
> >
> > > b)Removed macro CONFIG_PLAT_SAMSUNG and implemented other coding
> standards
> > > as suggested by kgene.kim at samsung.com
> > >
> > > ?arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 91
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > ?arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h | ? ?3 +
> > > ?2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-
> samsung/clock.c
> > > index e8d20b0..029a49d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock.c
> > > @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
> > > ?#include <linux/clk.h>
> > > ?#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > > ?#include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> > > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > ?#include <mach/hardware.h>
> > > ?#include <asm/irq.h>
> > > @@ -447,3 +450,91 @@ int __init s3c24xx_register_baseclocks(unsigned
long
> > > xtal)
> > > ? ? ? return 0;
> > > ?}
> > >
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> >
> > Hmm...please let me know the reason...
> same reason as above.
> >
> > > +/* debugfs support to trace clock tree hierarchy and attributes */
> > > +
> > > +static struct dentry *clk_debugfs_root;
> > > +
> > > +static int clk_debugfs_register_one(struct clk *c)
> > > +{
> > > + ? ? int err;
> > > + ? ? struct dentry *d, *child, *child_tmp;
> > > + ? ? struct clk *pa = c->parent;
> > > + ? ? char s[255];
> > > + ? ? char *p = s;
> > > +
> > > + ? ? p += sprintf(p, "%s", c->name);
> > > + ? ? /*Append id field with name also*/
> >
> > No need above comment. If required, please add other comments also.
> ok, will remove this comment in next patch.
> >
> > > + ? ? if (c->id >= 0)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? sprintf(p, ":%d", c->id);
> > > +
> > > + ? ? d = debugfs_create_dir(s, pa ? pa->dent : clk_debugfs_root);
> > > + ? ? if (!d)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + ? ? c->dent = d;
> > > +
> > > + ? ? d = debugfs_create_u8("usecount", S_IRUGO, c->dent, (u8
> > *)&c->usage);
> > > + ? ? if (!d) {
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? err = -ENOMEM;
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? goto err_out;
> > > + ? ? }
> >
> > 1 empty line would be helpful to read.
> ok, will update this in next patch.
> >
> > > + ? ? d = debugfs_create_u32("rate", S_IRUGO, c->dent, (u32
*)&c->rate);
> > > + ? ? if (!d) {
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? err = -ENOMEM;
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? goto err_out;
> > > + ? ? }
> > > + ? ? return 0;
> > > +
> > > +err_out:
> > > + ? ? d = c->dent;
> > > + ? ? list_for_each_entry_safe(child, child_tmp, &d->d_subdirs,
> > d_u.d_child)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? debugfs_remove(child);
> > > + ? ? debugfs_remove(c->dent);
> > > + ? ? return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int clk_debugfs_register(struct clk *c)
> > > +{
> > > + ? ? int err;
> > > + ? ? struct clk *pa = c->parent;
> > > +
> > > + ? ? if (pa && !pa->dent) {
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? err = clk_debugfs_register(pa);
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (err)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return err;
> > > + ? ? }
> > > +
> > > + ? ? if (!c->dent) {
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? err = clk_debugfs_register_one(c);
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (err)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return err;
> > > + ? ? }
> > > + ? ? return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __init clk_debugfs_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + ? ? struct clk *c;
> > > + ? ? struct dentry *d;
> > > + ? ? int err;
> > > +
> > > + ? ? d = debugfs_create_dir("clock", NULL);
> > > + ? ? if (!d)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENOMEM;
> > > + ? ? clk_debugfs_root = d;
> > > +
> > > + ? ? list_for_each_entry(c, &clocks, list) {
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? err = clk_debugfs_register(c);
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (err)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto err_out;
> > > + ? ? }
> > > + ? ? return 0;
> > > +err_out:
> > > + ? ? debugfs_remove_recursive(clk_debugfs_root);
> > > + ? ? return err;
> > > +}
> > > +late_initcall(clk_debugfs_init);
> > > +
> > > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) */
> > > +
> >
> > No need last one empty line.
> ok, will update this comment in next patch.
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h
b/arch/arm/plat-
> > > samsung/include/plat/clock.h
> > > index 0fbcd0e..9a82b88 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock.h
> > > @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct clk {
> > >
> > > ? ? ? struct clk_ops ? ? ? ? ?*ops;
> > > ? ? ? int ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (*enable)(struct clk *, int enable);
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> > > + ? ? struct dentry ? ? ? ? ? *dent; ?/* For visible tree hierarchy */
> > > +#endif
> > > ?};
> > >
> > > ?/* other clocks which may be registered by board support */
> > > --