From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:15:48 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] tile: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <018bba1e097552bc4054e6d90e3f03e7c9a632bb.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The only reason uaccess routines might sleep is if they fault. Make this explicit. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h index 8a082bc..e4d44bd 100644 --- a/arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ extern unsigned long __copy_in_user_inatomic( static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_in_user(void __user *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - might_sleep(); + might_fault(); return __copy_in_user_inatomic(to, from, n); } -- MST