From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:27:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ehci-platform: add the max clock number to 4 In-Reply-To: <414101470035152@web9j.yandex.ru> References: <20160731112536.4625-1-icenowy@aosc.xyz> <20160731112536.4625-3-icenowy@aosc.xyz> <2477355.hXm3xYUusy@wuerfel> <414101470035152@web9j.yandex.ru> Message-ID: <01a348da-3b26-68a6-9d9f-c37d81b4fd64@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 01-08-16 09:05, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > clocks = <&ccu CLK_A64_BUS_OHCI1>, > <&ccu CLK_A64_BUS_EHCI1>, > <&ccu CLK_A64_USB_OHCI0>, > <&ccu CLK_A64_USB_OHCI1>; > > On A64, EHCI requires the matched OHCI to work. Ah, so just like on the H3 (where this also is needed and not documented). > And OHCI1 clock requires OHCI0 clock to work. Hmm, that one is new, can you double check this ? Regards, Hans > > (But from the SoC's user manual we cannot get any infomation > about the relationship between OHCI1 clock and OHCI0 clock, > and in the manual OHCI0 clock is called OTG-OHCI) > > 01.08.2016, 15:01, "Arnd Bergmann" : >> On Sunday, July 31, 2016 7:25:36 PM CEST Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>> Allwinner A64 EHCI requires 4 clocks to be enabled. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng >> >> Can you say what those four clocks are? >> >> Are you sure that it's not just a case of a clock being >> incorrectly described in the clk driver, i.e. you reference >> one clock along with its parent here? >> >> Arnd