Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use of_find_matching_node_and_match

[<Cristian.Birsan@microchip.com>]

On 7/23/20 7:28 PM, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22.07.2020 17:43, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22.07.2020 16:44, cristian.birsan@microchip.com wrote:
>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> Instead of trying to match every possible compatible use
>>> of_find_matching_node_and_match() and pass the compatible array.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>>> index c5128c229c52..ee2b550aa400 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>>> @@ -2112,6 +2112,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_udc_dt_ids[] = {
>>>  
>>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_udc_dt_ids);
>>>  
>>> +static const struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_dt_ids[] = {
>>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc" },
>>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc" },
>>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc" },
>>> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>  						    struct usba_udc *udc)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -2128,13 +2135,17 @@ static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>  
>>>  	udc_config = match->data;
>>>  	udc->errata = udc_config->errata;
>>> -	udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc");
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> -		udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc");
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> -		udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc");
>>> -	if (udc->errata && IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> -		return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>>> +	if (udc->errata) {
>>> +		pp = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, atmel_pmc_dt_ids,
>>> +						     NULL);
>>> +		if (!pp)
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> +
>>> +		udc->pmc = syscon_node_to_regmap(pp);
>>> +		of_node_put(pp);
>>> +		if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> +			return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>>> +	}
>>
>> This seems a bit not similar. I may had been wrong at the moment I wrote
>> this patch. Probably the best would be:
>>
>> +	udc->pmc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +	pp = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, atmel_pmc_dt_ids,
>> +					     NULL);
>> +	if (pp) {
>> +		udc->pmc = syscon_node_to_regmap(pp);
>> +		of_node_put(pp);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if ((!pp || IS_ERR(udc->pmc)) && udc->errata)
>> +		return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
> 
> Actually, the initial patch should be good and simpler than what I proposed
> in previous email. Please ignore it.
> 
> Sorry for the noise!

I will rebase again the patchset on top of testing/next and send a V4 with your original version.

Regards,
Cristian Birsan 
> 
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Claudiu Beznea
>>
>>>  
>>>  	udc->num_ep = 0;
>>>  
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel