public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon@kernel.org>
Cc: soc@lists.linux.dev, soc <soc@kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/4] Renesas SoC updates for v7.1
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:11:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0234dc75-b042-4408-bbad-a777c0bddb3f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX4wKWPvRR=BBAr+1wAK2ZmW3kKxEN4W_vwNyGuzB=-gw@mail.gmail.com>

On 17/03/2026 09:46, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 at 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 12:12:56PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates
>>> for v7.1.
>>>
>>> It consists of 4 parts:
>>
>> I think pw-bot did not reply to any of these pulls, but I applied now
>> all of them.
> 
> That is correct: no replies from the pw-bot.
> renesas-dts-for-v7.1-tag1 does not seem to be in soc/for-next yet,
> perhaps you forgot to push? No need to confirm if that is true,

I pushed for-next a bit after this email.

The workflow is far from optimal, because it has two stages:
1. Iterate over each pull email, check, merge and eventually push only
this branch,

2. Merge to for-next and document the merges for internal
accounting/tracing. I guess I could merge it after each stage (1) above.

The bigger problem is lack of replies from pw-bot.


@Konstantin,
I use modified Rob's script to go over patch/pull queue in Patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?state=*

I deal with them one-by-one, so when I finish merging, I want to be sure
that Patchwork status is updated, thus through the script I mark it
"Accepted".
Like this one:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/patch/cover.1773399675.git.geert+renesas@glider.be/

Around then - can be just before or after - I push the updated branch to
git.kernel.org. I fear that because the pull is manually updated in
Patchwork to "Accepted", pw-bot ignores it and does not send the
notification.

Is it feasible to change pw-bot so it will notify even if it is marked
as "Accepted"? Or any ideas how to change the flow to have both:
A. pw-bot reply,
B. Be 100% sure that Patchwork status is updated (allow my manual update
via script)?


Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 11:12 [GIT PULL 0/4] Renesas SoC updates for v7.1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-13 11:12 ` [GIT PULL 1/4] Renesas ARM defconfig " Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-13 11:12 ` [GIT PULL 2/4] Renesas driver " Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-13 11:12 ` [GIT PULL 3/4] Renesas DT binding " Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-14 11:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-16  8:51     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-17  9:29       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-17  9:53         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-18 12:58           ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-13 11:13 ` [GIT PULL 4/4] Renesas DTS " Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-14 11:13   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-16  8:15     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-14 11:23   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-16  8:18     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-16  8:22       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-16  8:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-17  8:32 ` [GIT PULL 0/4] Renesas SoC " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-17  8:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-17  9:11     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-03-18 12:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-18 13:12         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0234dc75-b042-4408-bbad-a777c0bddb3f@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=mricon@kernel.org \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=soc@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox