From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
To: seanwang1 <seanwang1@lenovo.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: topology: add source check in arch_cpu_idle_enter()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:34:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02e5d090-ec8e-4f73-a298-3439e2a9ba37@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810102006.9986-1-seanwang1@lenovo.com>
On 10/08/26 15:50, seanwang1 wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> arch_cpu_idle_enter() directly calls amu_scale_freq_tick() to update
> arch_freq_scale when a CPU enters idle. This bypasses the sft_data
> pointer check that topology_clear_scale_freq_source() relies on.
>
> As a result, even after calling topology_clear_scale_freq_source()
> with SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH to disable AMU-based frequency scaling,
> the arch_freq_scale value can still be modified by AMU counters when
> the CPU goes idle through the arch_cpu_idle_enter() path.
>
> Add topology_scale_freq_source() helper to check whether a specific
> frequency scaling source is currently registered for a CPU. Use it
> in arch_cpu_idle_enter() to verify that AMU is the active source
> before calling amu_scale_freq_tick().
>
> This ensures that topology_clear_scale_freq_source() properly
> disables AMU updates in both the tick path (already handled by
> topology_scale_freq_tick()) and the idle path.
>
> Co-developed-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <seanwang1@lenovo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 3 +++
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index b32f13358fbb..cae5da68d5ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_enter(void)
> if (!amu_fie_cpu_supported(cpu))
> return;
>
> + if (!topology_scale_freq_source(SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH, cpu))
> + return;
> +
> /* Kick in AMU update but only if one has not happened already */
> if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) &&
> time_is_before_jiffies(per_cpu(cpu_amu_samples.last_scale_update, cpu)))
How about moving it into the condition below, so we only take the RCU
read side when an update is due rather than on every idle entry?
if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) &&
time_is_before_jiffies(per_cpu(cpu_amu_samples.last_scale_update, cpu)) &&
topology_scale_freq_source(SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH, cpu))
amu_scale_freq_tick();
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 8c5e47c28d9a..dfc2574a5588 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,20 @@ void topology_clear_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(topology_clear_scale_freq_source);
>
> +bool topology_scale_freq_source(enum scale_freq_source source, unsigned int cpu)
%s/topology_scale_freq_source/topology_is_scale_freq_source/ ?
> +{
> + struct scale_freq_data *sfd;
> + bool ret;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_sched();
> + sfd = rcu_dereference_sched(*per_cpu_ptr(&sft_data, cpu));
> + ret = (sfd && sfd->source == source);
> + rcu_read_unlock_sched();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(topology_scale_freq_source);
> +
Do we need to export it?
Thanks,
Sumit
....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 10:20 [PATCH v2] arm64: topology: add source check in arch_cpu_idle_enter() seanwang1
2026-08-10 11:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-11 6:23 ` [External] " Sean Wang1
2026-08-10 15:04 ` Sumit Gupta [this message]
2026-08-11 6:18 ` Sean Wang1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02e5d090-ec8e-4f73-a298-3439e2a9ba37@nvidia.com \
--to=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=seanwang1@lenovo.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox