[RFC] clk: samsung: Remove old clock drivers for s5pc100 and s5pv210

[kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)]

Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
> >
> > This patch removes old clock management code for S5PC100 and
> > S5PC110/S5PV210,
> > since the platform has been already moved to the new clock driver
> > using Common Clock Framework.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > This patch series require
> > S5PC100 and S5PV210 patch series moving to common clock framework.
> >
> >  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Kconfig  |    2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/Makefile |    1 -
> >  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c  | 1361
----------------------------------
> -
> > ----
> >  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig  |    2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile |    1 -
> >  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c  | 1365
----------------------------------
> -
> > -----
> >  6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2730 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> >
> In this case, would be easier to review with using "-D" for format-patch.
> 
> And this should be followed by moving common clk series for
> s5pc100/s5pv210.
> See s3c64xx common clk patches in v3.13-next/common-clk-s3c64xx branch as
> a
> reference.
> 
> And I have never seen common clk stuff for s5pc100. In addition, I'm not

Oh, I found, there is series for common clk s5pc100 :)

> sure we _still_ need to support s5pc100 in mainline.
> 
Thanks,
Kukjin