From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 22:40:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable multi-platform build support
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHxj-z1bWQqiaWVwvL2yRotqZn86ecjKcoHcyMQHZCrVcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1400655169-21683-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
 <1400655169-21683-3-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
 <1635304.bK37Q0Q4AO@amdc1032>
 <CAK9yfHxj-z1bWQqiaWVwvL2yRotqZn86ecjKcoHcyMQHZCrVcA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <036c01cf74fa$2da9c320$88fd4960$@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Sachin Kamat wrote:
> 
> Hi Bartlomiej,
> 
> On 21 May 2014 16:06, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:22:48 PM Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >>
> >> This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a
> >> multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the single-platform
> >> Exynos support.
> >
> > The patch description is wrong.  After this patch single-platform Exynos
> > support is no longer available
> 
> Forgot to update the message while rebasing. Thanks for noticing.
> 
> > and it adds at least one serious regression
> 
> I have mentioned about this in the cover letter.
> 
> > (cpufreq) which should be fixed before merging this patch.  Moreover it
> > seems that this patch (#2) should be merged with patch #3 to preserve
> > bisectability.
> 
> At this point exynos_defconfig works.
> 
> >Please also note that exynos_defconfig is no longer useful
> > after these changes and can be be removed.
> 
> Yes.
> 
Well, I think keeping the exynos_defconfig would be nice like other platform in multiplatforms...and I'm going to enable possible configs in exynos_defconfig for exynso SoCs then it can cover more for exynos...

Thanks,
Kukjin