From: sbkim73@samsung.com (Sangbeom Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: S3C6410: Support 800MHz operation in cpufreq
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:11:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <038c01cc20b9$a55a5120$f00ef360$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601104042.GA15387@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Mark Brown
> The fact that the chip is only on limited distribution isn't really an
> issue for supporting it in mainline - many CPUs currently supported in
> Linux, including some Samsung ones, are only available to certain
> customers.
As you said, limited distribution isn't issue,
Issue is that all s3c6410 can't support 800Mhz.
Even if some s3c6410 processor unable to support 800Mhz,
In some cases, It seems to work on 800Mhz.
But System suddenly can be dead after few days working.(system hang up)
So, If some developer want use 800Mhz, They should exactly know that
their s3c6410 can support 800Mhz or not.
I just want to say this.
800Mhz s3c6410 can be distinguished by checking laser mark.
> Similarly, stable power supplies are a basic system design thing that
> we shouldn't be worrying about here.
Even if 6410 can support 800Mhz, If power is unstable, system can be dead.
It is not 6410 problem. It is board problem.
When system hang up happened, In the most cases, regulator give unstable
VDD_ARM
(Even if regulator register setting is right)
You can just say that I don't care about that.
But System hang up isn't simple problem.
I want developer to know that If They try to develop 800Mhz 6410,
They should consider many things like board design,
selecting regulator, support 800Mhz etc.
So It is more desirable to add some comment for using 800Mhz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 9:43 [PATCH 0/5] S3C64xx updates Mark Brown
2011-06-01 9:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] CPUFREQ/S3C64xx: Move S3C64xx CPUfreq driver into drivers/cpufreq Mark Brown
2011-06-01 9:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add support for pre-sleep/post-restore gpio control Mark Brown
2011-06-01 9:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: S3C64XX: Ensure VIC based IRQs can be resumed from Mark Brown
2011-06-01 9:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: S3C6410: Support 800MHz operation in cpufreq Mark Brown
2011-06-01 10:30 ` Sangbeom Kim
2011-06-01 10:40 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-02 0:11 ` Sangbeom Kim [this message]
2011-06-02 8:28 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-02 9:41 ` Sangbeom Kim
2011-06-02 9:44 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-06-02 9:50 ` Jassi Brar
2011-06-02 9:55 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-06-02 9:56 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-02 9:57 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-06-01 9:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: S3C6410: Add some lower frequencies for 800MHz base clock operation Mark Brown
2011-06-01 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] CPUFREQ/S3C64xx: Move S3C64xx CPUfreq driver into drivers/cpufreq Kyungmin Park
2011-06-01 9:58 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-01 16:45 ` Dave Jones
2011-06-07 0:59 ` Dave Jones
2011-06-01 20:00 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-06-01 20:01 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-01 20:30 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='038c01cc20b9$a55a5120$f00ef360$@com' \
--to=sbkim73@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).