* Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for shared timer
2023-04-03 9:40 ` [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for shared timer Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2023-04-03 12:59 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-04-03 16:49 ` Alim Akhtar
2023-04-06 13:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Whitchurch @ 2023-04-03 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com
Cc: Vincent Whitchurch, lkp@intel.com, error27@gmail.com
On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 11:40 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> For a shared timers, the mct_init_dt() should not initialize the clock
> even with global comparator. This is not an error, thus the function
> should simply return 0, not 'ret'.
>
> This also fixes smatch warning:
>
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c:635 mct_init_dt() warn: missing error code? 'ret'
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202304021446.46XVKag0-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for shared timer
2023-04-03 9:40 ` [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for shared timer Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-03 12:59 ` Vincent Whitchurch
@ 2023-04-03 16:49 ` Alim Akhtar
2023-04-06 13:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alim Akhtar @ 2023-04-03 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Krzysztof Kozlowski', 'Daniel Lezcano',
'Thomas Gleixner', linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-samsung-soc
Cc: 'Vincent Whitchurch', 'kernel test robot',
'Dan Carpenter'
Hello Krzysztof
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 3:10 PM
> To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>; Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@linutronix.de>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>;
> Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>; kernel test robot
> <lkp@intel.com>; Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for
> shared timer
>
> For a shared timers, the mct_init_dt() should not initialize the clock
even with
> global comparator. This is not an error, thus the function should simply
> return 0, not 'ret'.
>
> This also fixes smatch warning:
>
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c:635 mct_init_dt() warn: missing error
> code? 'ret'
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202304021446.46XVKag0-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> index bfd60093ee1c..ef8cb1b71be4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -677,17 +677,17 @@ static int __init mct_init_dt(struct device_node
> *np, unsigned int int_type)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> /*
> * When the FRC is shared with a main processor, this secondary
> * processor cannot use the global comparator.
> */
> if (frc_shared)
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
>
> return exynos4_clockevent_init();
> }
>
>
> static int __init mct_init_spi(struct device_node *np) {
> return mct_init_dt(np, MCT_INT_SPI);
> --
> 2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for shared timer
2023-04-03 9:40 ` [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: explicitly return 0 for shared timer Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-03 12:59 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-04-03 16:49 ` Alim Akhtar
@ 2023-04-06 13:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2023-04-06 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Thomas Gleixner, Alim Akhtar, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Cc: Vincent Whitchurch, kernel test robot, Dan Carpenter
On 03/04/2023 11:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> For a shared timers, the mct_init_dt() should not initialize the clock
> even with global comparator. This is not an error, thus the function
> should simply return 0, not 'ret'.
>
> This also fixes smatch warning:
>
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c:635 mct_init_dt() warn: missing error code? 'ret'
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202304021446.46XVKag0-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
Applied, thanks
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread