From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 21:18:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03ef01cf9526$83e93b70$8bbbb250$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5806444.UHVgoFeOY3@wuerfel>
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:21:16 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config PLAT_SAMSUNG
> >
> > config PLAT_S5P
> > bool
> > - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> > default y
> > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > select ARM_VIC
> > @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ config SAMSUNG_CLKSRC
> > used by newer systems such as the S3C64XX.
> >
> > config S5P_CLOCK
> > - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> > help
> > Support common clock part for ARCH_S5P and ARCH_EXYNOS SoCs
> >
> > # options for IRQ support
> >
> > config S5P_IRQ
> > - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> > help
> > Support common interrupt part for ARCH_S5P SoCs
> >
> > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ config S3C_GPIO_TRACK
> >
> > config S5P_DEV_UART
> > def_bool y
> > - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> > + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> >
> > # ADC driver
> >
>
> I guess the next logical step would be to either remove these entirely
> after the move to DT-only ARCH_S5PV210 obsoletes them, or to move the
> code back to mach-s5pv210, right?
>
Yeah both are possible, but the latter would be more possible at this moment,
I think. I will cleanup stuff in plat-samsung as you suggested :-)
>
> > config SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> > bool "Use legacy Samsung DMA abstraction"
> > - depends on CPU_S5PV210 || CPU_S5PC100 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> > + depends on CPU_S5PV210 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> > select DMADEVICES
> > default y
> > help
>
> It would be good to just kill this one off now, as nothing uses it
> any more, but that's also a separate patch.
>
Maybe it is still used for s5pv210 and s3c64xx? If I misunderstand your
comments, please kindly let me know.
Thanks,
Kukjin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-01 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 10:21 [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 10:21 ` [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 11:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 12:18 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2014-07-01 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 12:55 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='03ef01cf9526$83e93b70$8bbbb250$@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).