* RE: [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block
2025-05-06 8:01 ` [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block Pritam Manohar Sutar
@ 2025-05-10 2:28 ` Alim Akhtar
2025-05-12 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-05-12 6:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alim Akhtar @ 2025-05-10 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Pritam Manohar Sutar', krzk, s.nawrocki, cw00.choi,
mturquette, sboyd, sunyeal.hong
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-clk, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
rosa.pila, dev.tailor, faraz.ata, 'stable'
Hi Pritam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 1:32 PM
> To: krzk@kernel.org; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; cw00.choi@samsung.com;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org;
> sunyeal.hong@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; Pritam Manohar Sutar
> <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; stable <stable@kernel.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block
>
> clk_summary shows wrong value for "mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user".
> It shows 400Mhz instead of 40Mhz as below.
>
> dout_shared2_div4 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user 0 0 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> dout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
>
> Correct the clk_tree by adding correct clock parent for
> "mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user".
>
> Post this change, clk_summary shows correct value.
>
> dout_shared2_div4 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> dout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
>
> Fixes: 485e13fe2fb6 ("clk: samsung: add top clock support for ExynosAuto
> v920 SoC")
> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block
2025-05-06 8:01 ` [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block Pritam Manohar Sutar
2025-05-10 2:28 ` Alim Akhtar
@ 2025-05-12 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-05-12 6:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-05-12 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar, s.nawrocki, cw00.choi, alim.akhtar,
mturquette, sboyd, sunyeal.hong
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-clk, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
rosa.pila, dev.tailor, faraz.ata, stable
On 06/05/2025 10:01, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> clk_summary shows wrong value for "mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user".
> It shows 400Mhz instead of 40Mhz as below.
>
> dout_shared2_div4 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user 0 0 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> dout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
>
> Correct the clk_tree by adding correct clock parent for
> "mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user".
>
> Post this change, clk_summary shows correct value.
>
> dout_shared2_div4 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> dout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
>
> Fixes: 485e13fe2fb6 ("clk: samsung: add top clock support for ExynosAuto v920 SoC")
> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Run checkpatch BEFORE you send the patches.
WARNING: Invalid email format for stable: 'stable <stable@kernel.org>',
prefer 'stable@kernel.org'
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block
2025-05-06 8:01 ` [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block Pritam Manohar Sutar
2025-05-10 2:28 ` Alim Akhtar
2025-05-12 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-05-12 6:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-05-12 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: krzk, s.nawrocki, cw00.choi, alim.akhtar, mturquette, sboyd,
sunyeal.hong, Pritam Manohar Sutar
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-clk, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
rosa.pila, dev.tailor, faraz.ata, stable
On Tue, 06 May 2025 13:31:54 +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> clk_summary shows wrong value for "mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user".
> It shows 400Mhz instead of 40Mhz as below.
>
> dout_shared2_div4 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> mout_hsi1_usbdrd_user 0 0 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
> dout_clkcmu_hsi1_usbdrd 0 0 0 40000000 0 0 50000 Y ...
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] clk: samsung: correct clock summary for hsi1 block
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/81214185e7e1fc6dfc8661a574c457accaf9a5a4
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread