From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:10:17 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
In-Reply-To: <20111121172344.GA4483@kroah.com>
References: <33510089.42761321876635907.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml08>
 <20111121172344.GA4483@kroah.com>
Message-ID: <046f01ccb011$6d111370$47333a50$%kim@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Greg KH wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com;
> yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> Samsung
> > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > > board
> > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > >
> > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > Thanks.
> > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> 
Hi Greg,

Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...

Anyway,

> So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> right?
> 
> If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> 
Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can avoid
useless conflicts.

I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
with my ack?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.