From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
joro@8bytes.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
skolothumtho@nvidia.com, praan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:53:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04fc0c2e-9649-4cde-9415-e7e0e7145776@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTiO69YZ9WA8dFe0@nvidia.com>
在 2025/12/10 05:04, Nicolin Chen 写道:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 11:43:41AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
>> Hi, Nicolin,
>>
>> Nit. Instead of duplicating this code, we can leverage the existing
>> arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste() helper here.
>
> Thanks for the review. I squashed the following changes:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
> index 1672e75ebffc2..197b8b55fe7a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ static struct mm_struct sva_mm = {
> enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat {
> ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS = BIT(0),
> ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL = BIT(1),
> + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED = BIT(2),
> };
>
> +static void arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste,
> + enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat);
> +
> static bool arm_smmu_entry_differs_in_used_bits(const __le64 *entry,
> const __le64 *used_bits,
> const __le64 *target,
> @@ -198,6 +202,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste,
> };
>
> arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss);
> + if (feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED) {
> + struct arm_smmu_ste s2ste;
> + int i;
> +
> + arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
> + ste->data[0] |= cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED));
> + ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
> + for (i = 2; i < NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS; i++)
> + ste->data[i] = s2ste.data[i];
> + }
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_abort(struct kunit *test)
> @@ -555,46 +570,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_s1_stall(struct kunit *test)
> NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3));
> }
>
> -static void arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(
> - struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, unsigned int s1dss, const dma_addr_t dma_addr,
> - enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat)
> -{
> - bool stall_enabled = feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL;
> - bool ats_enabled = feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS;
> - struct arm_smmu_ste s1ste;
> -
> - struct arm_smmu_master master = {
> - .ats_enabled = ats_enabled,
> - .cd_table.cdtab_dma = dma_addr,
> - .cd_table.s1cdmax = 0xFF,
> - .cd_table.s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2,
> - .smmu = &smmu,
> - .stall_enabled = stall_enabled,
> - };
> -
> - arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
> - arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&s1ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss);
> -
> - ste->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> - STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED));
> - ste->data[0] |= s1ste.data[0] & ~cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG);
> - ste->data[1] |= s1ste.data[1];
> - /* Merge events for DoS mitigations on eventq */
> - ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
> -}
> -
> static void
> arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1dssbypass_to_s1bypass(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste;
> struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste;
>
> - arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(&s1_ste,
> - STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS,
> - fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
> - ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
> + arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(
> + &s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
> + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED);
> arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0);
> + /* Expect an additional sync to unset ignored bits: EATS and MEV */
> arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s1_ste, &s2_ste,
> NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3));
> }
> @@ -605,10 +591,9 @@ arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1bypass_to_s1dssbypass(struct kunit *test)
> struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste;
> struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste;
>
> - arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(&s1_ste,
> - STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS,
> - fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
> - ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
> + arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(
> + &s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
> + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED);
> arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0);
> arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s2_ste, &s1_ste,
> NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(2));
Nice work. LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Thanks.
Shuai
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-07 20:49 [PATCH rc v2 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix hitless STE update in nesting cases Nicolin Chen
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add ignored bits to fix STE update sequence Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08 2:33 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE MEV when computing the " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08 2:33 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE EATS " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08 2:33 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08 3:43 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-09 21:04 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-12-10 1:53 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04fc0c2e-9649-4cde-9415-e7e0e7145776@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).