From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: galak@codeaurora.org (Kumar Gala) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:52:02 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: msm: Move msm devicetrees under a Qualcomm dir In-Reply-To: References: <1379003839-16068-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> <25E0B143-658E-4CCC-A88A-0AF70FFF33CE@codeaurora.org> <3E38F48E-EE41-4564-84A1-36CF07B08811@codeaurora.org> <20130912224737.GA24937@codeaurora.org> <9EA264FE-7621-458D-8333-9340DDBFC4EE@codeaurora.org> <52374DD1.9040209@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <0618B96B-2F6C-4D67-9D32-0B74E898496F@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> I think the two options are either: >> >> qcom-msm*, qcom-apq*, etc >> >> or >> >> qcom/msm-*, qcom/apq*, etc >> >> I'm guessing we'll end up without the dir and in the future have: >> >> qcom/qcom-msm-*, qcom/qcom-apq-* >> >> Olof??? > > > When you create the dir, you can go from qcom-msm-* to qcom/msm-*, but > still produce qcom-msm-*.dtb as the build output. We care about > keeping the DTB name stable, not DTS. As long as they just conform to > those two patterns it's easy to handle through makefile targets. Sounds good, Rohit let's go ahead with qcom-msm-*, qcom-apq-*. - k