From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:37:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable multi-platform build support In-Reply-To: <201404222156.48432.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1397554134-11827-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <1397554134-11827-6-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <201404222156.48432.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <065d01cf6e65$0e903dc0$2bb0b940$@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Olof Johansson wrote: > > I don't think there's a point in keeping this around. A > > "single-platform" config is just enabling a single platform in the > > config, it's not a specific option. I don't think any of the other > > platforms use anything like this today. > > The only one doing that is shmobile, but only because they have > some SoCs that are multiplatform capable and some that are not. > This isn't the case for Exynos, so it should no longer be needed. > > When I originally created this patch 18 months ago, there were a > number of drivers that broke when multiplatform got enabled. > Now the cpufreq driver is the only one left, but it seems that > it will make it for 3.16, and I wouldn't wait for it if it doesn't. > Let's just do multiplatform-only. > In my position in S.LSI, I'd like to keep the current ARCH_EXYNOS4 and EXYNOS5 because IMHO selecting each series would be helpful on real product, multiplatform is available though. Additionally EXYNOS3 is being added. It's true we can support exynos-multiplatform even though above options are included... Thanks, Kukjin