From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D37AC27C53 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:30:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gAs4OzU1Oz3fZkEyE0fXcGDcqifaH35w5B5v23oDbGw=; b=r6ZMbwnzd4ngT0msQyf3ZavtMq Ouco7G5jT3YjpPjyh9ho8RFYjt1q/iqFpBkKsd94uLJvKHnd78i9ENueOwXiZ3lE0j3vZH3cZAJlX Yq2bPJXGAQGOTJnhbVOwADzArvUnU/B0GHnyg51bctKl//lkzq40J7n6MaULxqaiW9960WQ7eCJ5D hAosvfCIHMKw9ytMB3+ASCDSJhK4K/yNTmrHxCSMX2ue1y1fP1/07+SH66I9w+MsY5flAsT4VAQIz D6DxeP2sYPbSsqn0C2qHDOXWvjPby4OcFc6TkGDOAWzl1aTvwg+FkA2nvKB8MGd0ARMbVY54/42nS qO3W5VsA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sKy0E-0000000Brjj-1r1b; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:29:50 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([2a01:4f8:c0c:51f3::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sKy09-0000000Briz-1MgU; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:29:47 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1719052181; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gAs4OzU1Oz3fZkEyE0fXcGDcqifaH35w5B5v23oDbGw=; b=nLBuVgLdi1Ma3AsC4BcduWrQtZljtVvLRLy8P++PL4vrCvYI8UjuY1RWa1GQEQUYAss95u ZhOlYTGJL8HfYiXljF3nuWBQhZXfcw60f48BGapi1QZ1eZnQVwQ7Z7NG5tBGYdPdNEEMDi vf45ho21uqRa1x6iiIU5HK0qfJKGsT+YzEjZUhSLXR7eeufJ6saJjzserH6ceUmcMOmi6R heTdohQ4ujLYbMNd9ySFlM9XgOJgb9j8eaZow2P5XcKZ4XbABY2Qku9+KTFWgnBxsZn8bM tlmA2OK7w48oxzYmXFfp1fzheQXxkSryBkQwf3IG2ms7svnYumxZQIfTJZMqdg== Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:29:33 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Daniel Golle , Aurelien Jarno , Olivia Mackall , Herbert Xu , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Philipp Zabel , Sebastian Reichel , Anand Moon , Sascha Hauer , Martin Kaiser , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwrng: add Rockchip SoC hwrng driver In-Reply-To: References: <57a7fb13451f066ddc8d1d9339d8f6c1e1946bf1.1718921174.git.daniel@makrotopia.org> <173ce1663186ab8282356748abcac3f4@manjaro.org> Message-ID: <07fba45d99e9eabf9bcca71b86651074@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240622_032945_994556_FE06CFE8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello Uwe, On 2024-06-22 00:16, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On 6/21/24 20:13, Dragan Simic wrote: >> On 2024-06-21 11:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 21/06/2024 03:25, Daniel Golle wrote: >>>> From: Aurelien Jarno >> >> [snip] >> >>>> +    pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, >>>> RK_RNG_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY); >>>> +    pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev); >>>> +    pm_runtime_enable(dev); >>>> + >>>> +    ret = devm_hwrng_register(dev, &rk_rng->rng); >>>> +    if (ret) >>>> +        return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to register >>>> Rockchip hwrng\n"); >>>> + >>>> +    dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Registered Rockchip hwrng\n"); >>> >>> Drop, driver should be silent on success. >> >> I respectfully disagree.  Many drivers print a single line upon >> successful probing, which I find very useful.  In this particular >> case, it's even more useful, because some people may be concerned >> about the use of hardware TRNGs, so we should actually make sure >> to announce it. > > I agree to Krzysztof here. From the POV of a driver author, your own > driver is very important and while you write it, it really interests > *you* if the driver is successfully probed. However from a system > perspective these are annoying: There are easily >50 devices[1] on a > system, if all of these print a message in probe, you have little > chance > to see the relevant messages. Even if every driver author thinks their > work is a special snow flake that is worth announcing, in practice > users > only care about your driver if there is a problem. Additionally each > message takes time and so delays the boot process. Additionally each > message takes place in the printk ring buffer and so edges out earlier > messages that might be more important. Well, I don't find those messages annoying, for the drivers I've had nothing to do with. Also, in my experience, 99.9% of users don't care about the kernel messages at all, be it everything hunky-dory, or be it something really wrong somewhere. > So +1 for dropping the dev_info() or at least using dev_debug() for it. > > Best regards > Uwe > > [1] On my laptop if have: > > $ find /sys/devices -name driver | wc -l > 87 > > On a Raspberrypi it yields 66.