From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Optimize the iteration of scmi_requested_devices
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 18:09:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <094fc69e-a7b3-41bc-b5a7-cdc8a8deeef2@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106065724.3674510-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 02:57:24PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> scmi_requested_devices is organized in IDR based link lists, so only
> need to search the link lists when there is a match protocol_id.
>
> Back to search the next id with 'continue' to save cpu cycles, if
> protocol_id does not match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> RFC:
> Tested on i.MX95.
>
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> index 157172a5f2b5..42deab5903fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ static int scmi_protocol_device_request(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
> if (rdev->id_table->protocol_id ==
> id_table->protocol_id)
> phead = head;
> + else
> + continue;
> }
> list_for_each_entry(rdev, head, node) {
> if (!strcmp(rdev->id_table->name, id_table->name)) {
> @@ -89,6 +91,7 @@ static int scmi_protocol_device_request(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
> goto out;
> }
> }
> + break;
> }
I suspect your patch is correct but we could go further. Removing the
test for if (!phead) really helps readability.
regards,
dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
index a3386bf36de5..2c853c84b58f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
@@ -72,14 +72,11 @@ static int scmi_protocol_device_request(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
*/
mutex_lock(&scmi_requested_devices_mtx);
idr_for_each_entry(&scmi_requested_devices, head, id) {
- if (!phead) {
- /* A list found registered in the IDR is never empty */
- rdev = list_first_entry(head, struct scmi_requested_dev,
- node);
- if (rdev->id_table->protocol_id ==
- id_table->protocol_id)
- phead = head;
- }
+ /* A list found registered in the IDR is never empty */
+ rdev = list_first_entry(head, struct scmi_requested_dev, node);
+ if (rdev->id_table->protocol_id != id_table->protocol_id)
+ continue;
+
list_for_each_entry(rdev, head, node) {
if (!strcmp(rdev->id_table->name, id_table->name)) {
pr_err("Ignoring duplicate request [%d] %s\n",
@@ -89,6 +86,8 @@ static int scmi_protocol_device_request(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
goto out;
}
}
+ phead = head;
+ break;
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-06 6:57 [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Optimize the iteration of scmi_requested_devices Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-01-06 15:09 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2025-01-07 1:49 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=094fc69e-a7b3-41bc-b5a7-cdc8a8deeef2@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox