From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1342C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:42:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+AN/Q9mjxfZf+3oCPTimdRzvwuN2qWDZFF8FbKf9mOc=; b=suQRpimExime0albeA74pfzDYW zrBJqUngWfTYYQuKc3+oJg3WeOlDIu4NtcqH7R6RjlJPS70BqrdVPNysuos1kWM+bcihbxG6IikSF AnY8dXVzt2M4sH6QdsHBOaCNr2h1k/GUsag2wIBwAYmszcpjComMpHqXL4CUurzxo/246L69wJPjF /05/yOcZXjZg1UX2CudZkWVXVvSzl2G+Op+P1YF3AdLUpNWckQgEtFxsOoiDQEIIkSv155IEBUQda JiNMdz8R8wKjzcTfNW2w95FjWN5ih4CNfaeQCP3jcYEpY1wcrSojA6N0Y23oxguHUKF3+v10FNehH tv6yB0Aw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mx76y-00DzYR-V2; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:40:53 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mx74v-00DyuB-Km; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:38:47 +0000 Received: from dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JCybQ1qB2zcbwK; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:38:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:38:43 +0800 Received: from [10.174.178.55] (10.174.178.55) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:38:42 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 05/10] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel[_low]() into crash_core.c To: Baoquan He CC: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , , "H . Peter Anvin" , , Dave Young , Vivek Goyal , Eric Biederman , , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , , "Jonathan Corbet" , , Randy Dunlap , Feng Zhou , Kefeng Wang , Chen Zhou References: <20211210065533.2023-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20211210065533.2023-6-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20211214104558.GA28607@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <097c6a8c-3b96-19b4-2bb9-bf2dcb4a6109@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:38:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211214104558.GA28607@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211214_043845_900792_3F72EE9E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2021/12/14 18:45, Baoquan He wrote: >> + /* User specifies base address explicitly. */ > If you plan to repost, please take above sentence off either. Then we > can say this patch is only doing code moving. > >> + unsigned long long start; >> + > OK, I can see that this patch is only moving code, and introducing > CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL to wrap them appropriately, no > extra functionality change added or removed, except of this place. > An alignment checking is added for the user specified base address. > I love this checking. While I have to say it will be more perfect if > it's put in another small patch, that will be look much better from > patch splitting and reviewing point of view. Good eye. I will put it in a new patch. > > This whole patch looks great to me, thanks for the effort. > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel