[PATCH/RESEND] ARM: Kconfig: Remove duplicate IRQ Kconfig entries

[PATCH/RESEND] ARM: Kconfig: Remove duplicate IRQ Kconfig entries

[Stephen Boyd]

These kconfig entries are already defined in kernel/irq/Kconfig
so select them instead of redefining them.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig |   10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 7a08e37..a3ae6e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ config ARM
 	select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if (PERF_EVENTS && (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7))
 	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
 	select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
+	select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
+	select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
 	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
 	select CPU_PM if (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
 	select GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
@@ -125,14 +127,6 @@ config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
 	bool
 	default y
 
-config HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
-	bool
-	default y
-
-config GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
-	bool
-	default y
-
 config GENERIC_LOCKBREAK
 	bool
 	default y
-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

[PATCH/RESEND] ARM: Kconfig: Remove duplicate IRQ Kconfig entries

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

Who are you expecting to pick up on this patch?  You're sending it _to_
the mailing list rather than to a person.  Are you expecting all
subscribers to pick it up and apply it individually? ;)

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:35:11AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> These kconfig entries are already defined in kernel/irq/Kconfig
> so select them instead of redefining them.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig |   10 ++--------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 7a08e37..a3ae6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ config ARM
>  	select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if (PERF_EVENTS && (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7))
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
> +	select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> +	select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
>  	select CPU_PM if (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
>  	select GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP
> @@ -125,14 +127,6 @@ config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
>  	bool
>  	default y
>  
> -config HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> -	bool
> -	default y
> -
> -config GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
> -	bool
> -	default y
> -
>  config GENERIC_LOCKBREAK
>  	bool
>  	default y
> -- 
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH/RESEND] ARM: Kconfig: Remove duplicate IRQ Kconfig entries

[Stephen Boyd]

On 04/10/12 03:12, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Who are you expecting to pick up on this patch?  You're sending it _to_
> the mailing list rather than to a person.  Are you expecting all
> subscribers to pick it up and apply it individually? ;)

I was hoping Thomas would ack it and you would say "Please put it into
the patch tracker". Step 1 can probably be skipped with a proper timeout
applied.

Usually I send a patch _to_ a mailing list and a maintainer says
"Thanks, applied". For you, "Thanks, applied" is "Please put it into the
patch tracker".

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

[PATCH/RESEND] ARM: Kconfig: Remove duplicate IRQ Kconfig entries

[Stephen Boyd]

> On 04/10/12 03:12, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> Who are you expecting to pick up on this patch?  You're sending it _to_
>> the mailing list rather than to a person.  Are you expecting all
>> subscribers to pick it up and apply it individually? ;)
>
> I was hoping Thomas would ack it and you would say "Please put it into
> the patch tracker". Step 1 can probably be skipped with a proper timeout
> applied.
>
> Usually I send a patch _to_ a mailing list and a maintainer says
> "Thanks, applied". For you, "Thanks, applied" is "Please put it into the
> patch tracker".
>

The timer expired so I just threw it into the patch tracker.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.