From: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: configs: keystone: Remove this defconfig
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:31:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ab47165-3ba3-4d34-aea0-9bc12fd5ff31@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124164116.k5ah56xvuclfkxdr@despise>
On 1/24/24 10:41 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:28-20240124, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> TI Keystone devices can and should use the common multi-v7 defconfig.
>> Currently it is not clear which defconfig should be used and so config
>> options for Keystone boards are added to either both defconfigs, or only
>> one or the other. As nice as it is to have a config just for this platform
>> it is a maintenance burden. As it is not used by generic distros it is not
>> very useful to continue to maintain. Remove this defconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig | 238 ----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 238 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig
>>
>
> There are a bunch of downstream folks who will have recipe fails etc if
> we do that. I am not sure we need to go down that route.
>
That is the point of this patch, we want to stop any remaining downstream
folks from using this defconfig. It is not maintained nor updated like
the multi_v7_defconfig, any new or needed options will only be added to
multi-v7 defconfig.
> I know we had intent on multi_v7_defconfig -> but as far as I recollect,
> at least during armv7 it did'nt exactly pan out as it did on armv8.
>
It worked for ARMv8 as it wasn't allowed go spin up custom defconfigs for
every random platform. It will work here for many/most platforms just the
same if they do what I'm doing here and remove their old unneeded defconfigs.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 16:28 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Add more TI Keystone support Andrew Davis
2024-01-24 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: configs: keystone: Remove this defconfig Andrew Davis
2024-01-24 16:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-24 17:31 ` Andrew Davis [this message]
2024-01-24 18:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-24 18:52 ` Andrew Davis
2024-01-24 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-25 13:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-24 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Add more TI Keystone support Nishanth Menon
2024-01-24 16:59 ` Andrew Davis
2024-01-24 17:21 ` Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ab47165-3ba3-4d34-aea0-9bc12fd5ff31@ti.com \
--to=afd@ti.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox