From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 035FAD65526 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:15:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc :References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:MIME-Version :Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=skfOYgfAuvLlvVFtYXO0nED04VoALMEVUW5taGZIDUg=; b=0Bu0Rs2CXYriTAPX8FfLAFKiN8 Yf205gQxHBuhj/otp2BVB+uVVb1EAtWcpuAsUI0tpVI2aubT4aR3cKiJ+8pgvNbQBbsD5hcxK54PO yniBoRntGIYMWOOCICvZB5eSFw5gYg8IDiTSvvsZFd7v4rni/GKyQ6yFMc5f/Vv1UhJhM+7napc31 y/XYK1eAEl2e2ULlioB9kU+pIFfWyAzoEarXHN8Vd6biXXTdYk6I1TJUvBOfgxCe3hADUVo8RVzOh LJoQRbI1tTTII3oRO7Yyzo9ui8uu+WYzAjqNZsvCaPXy6Eqg+34aHl3W1wugWIVKI3TTshM1jV4XT 0nOzEjCw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vVoZF-00000006ZSJ-15Jl; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:15:37 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vVoZC-00000006ZNz-0eCY; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:15:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DF26055A; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C07F6C4CEF5; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:15:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765966531; bh=skfOYgfAuvLlvVFtYXO0nED04VoALMEVUW5taGZIDUg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:From; b=Nz6p3DZzkqG8H4Nvbd2AHyWRx3TWgtrkGHCbG7nJP/yZ7YpQbUQ4sScJ0axpFSM76 N3I04sjA4YLG+NMnOi+SoQIqDF1B4dY/9PK8lKk7/0Ac6Kknuhe3HgXPUfh1dMkWaL gGtES1r559SgmtcLu2EFp2cMk2ewcqkb19tBrfbdgplxNfF+Y9Pf1SbaPVem2zSlaP rRBieyJeZ4v6dRrrqHwDQZDFBOJQdzqi9c/tID5E3JhRqWUOg026uwBdbq6QPX5GKc p8HKcRIw2JDAKvrK23Ukl+qpfo+Ew8yzKm60eggM9XvyoV4GM2kJUpBxmyM6Rv6pA2 udWFcrUaXyBwg== Message-ID: <0ba037c65f9cadd51082abf2b7857ba7@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:15:28 +0000 From: "Maxime Ripard" To: "Luca Ceresoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/22] drm/bridge: add of_drm_find_and_get_bridge() In-Reply-To: <20251216-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_of_find_bridge-v3-1-b5165fab8058@bootlin.com> References: <20251216-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_of_find_bridge-v3-1-b5165fab8058@bootlin.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Alexey Brodkin" , "Andrzej Hajda" , "David Airlie" , "Fabio Estevam" , "Hui Pu" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Jerome Brunet" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Kevin Hilman" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Liu Ying" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Martin Blumenstingl" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , "Phong LE" , "Robert Foss" , "Sascha Hauer" , "Shawn Guo" , "Simona Vetter" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Thomas Zimmermann" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 18:58:34 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > of_drm_find_bridge() does not increment the refcount for the returned > bridge, but that is required now. However converting it and all its users > is not realistically doable at once given the large amount of (direct and > indirect) callers and the complexity of some. >=20 >=20 > [ ... ] Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard Thanks! Maxime