From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240E5C433EF for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 09:01:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Date :Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: List-Owner; bh=XveV6I1aIyC33V6IrWF1UaMY+1rZ0XdUpeiB/WJd0Kk=; b=A2ydpmwIalJEW+ T9l9+v1tzjCo3LOJTWkLbp0qK1Ve5QLAy9PhM/jxp/ZTWsvo/8lcwcLnuuEJLLCDWhu+I0fGnEOE4 TriCaEbyV6VP0MpjtwHTQ//bye1MwfRGEeh6+Oe2yvIrR/JSR1j8r2crLT/bitKPFDHrj9bFmRCWa vqLCMb/v/qtWRuK8K0m7LV0J4SR1D6rIzX1tZA4AjM5pCe5N3KGwc3sVCEjt/7hq9S8bsGBmN1Dsi JqcHK+j0qs9kp9EDXFs5zPdh5+OZFW/0iddd25smFNlMF2OLqIMQfr/46OEK7klZ+gDZhAL8VWdDE 8L6JsIUMRHq9ZJKdsbfw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ntms4-00AVQw-4n; Wed, 25 May 2022 09:00:00 +0000 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ntmry-00AVOL-JJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 08:59:58 +0000 Received: from dggpemm500022.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4L7Q496S71zDqSw; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:59:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.183) by dggpemm500022.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:59:41 +0800 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by dggpemm500007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:59:40 +0800 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.81.184]) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.81.184]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Wed, 25 May 2022 09:59:39 +0100 From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Robin Murphy , "rafael@kernel.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" CC: "Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Linuxarm , "will@kernel.org" , wanghuiqiang , "steven.price@arm.com" , "Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" , "jon@solid-run.com" , "eric.auger@redhat.com" , "laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com" , "hch@infradead.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Thread-Topic: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Thread-Index: AQHYXwu3gTgIMyz0zUiu6Dja1BmGsa0PbqaAgAhOLiD///4qAIAE064AgAYtdiCADLBS4A== Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 08:59:39 +0000 Message-ID: <0c12f81f62f8415f8061cb844f779904@huawei.com> References: <20220503163330.509-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <2234ad60-c49f-8c72-616c-dfa5300354ef@huawei.com> <8e4f012717e34195a53cb73f8ce28627@huawei.com> <5c8ae673-f8e3-0ed3-e62d-d445913b012c@arm.com> <20220513094940.GA23371@lpieralisi> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.202.227.178] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220525_015955_042800_DBE10F5A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Sent: 17 May 2022 08:18 > To: 'Lorenzo Pieralisi' ; Robin Murphy > ; rafael@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org > Cc: Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) ; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Linuxarm ; > will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang ; > steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; jon@solid-run.com; > eric.auger@redhat.com; laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com; hch@infradead.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com] > > Sent: 13 May 2022 10:50 > > To: Robin Murphy ; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > > ; rafael@kernel.org; > > joro@8bytes.org > > Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi ; > > Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) ; > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; > > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Linuxarm ; > > will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang ; > > steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; jon@solid-run.com; > > eric.auger@redhat.com; laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com; hch@infradead.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node > > > > [with Christoph's correct email address] > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > On 2022-05-10 08:23, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > > > > Hi Joerg/Robin, > > > > > > > > I think this series is now ready to be merged. Could you please let > > > > me know if there is anything missing. > > > > > > Fine by me - these patches have had enough review and testing now that > > > even if anything else did come up, I think it would be better done as > > > follow-up work on the merged code. > > > > Given the ACPICA dependency I believe it is best for this series > > to go via the ACPI tree, right ? > > > > I assume there are all the required ACKs for that to happen. > > The SMMUv3/SMMU related changes (patches 6 - 9) still doesn't have > explicit ACK from maintainers other than the go ahead above from Robin. > > Just thought of highlighting it as not sure that will be an issue or not. > All, Just a gentle ping on this series again. Any chance this can make into 5.19? Please consider. Thanks, Shameer _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel