linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	will@kernel.org, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	steven.price@arm.com, Sami.Mujawar@arm.com, jon@solid-run.com,
	yangyicong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:37:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cde239c-8d30-33a8-6e5b-792e30e20462@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ecce421-e2ee-1a19-ae2d-a8454a8a5844@arm.com>

Hi Robin

On 3/11/22 11:34 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-03-11 08:19, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> On 2/21/22 4:43 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since we now have an updated verion[0] of IORT spec(E.d) which
>>> addresses the memory attributes issues discussed here [1],
>>> this series now make use of it.
>>>
>>> The pull request for ACPICA E.d related changes are already
>>> raised and can be found here,
>>> https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/752
>>>
>>> v7 --> v8
>>>    - Patch #1 has temp definitions for RMR related changes till
>>>      the ACPICA header changes are part of kernel.
>>>    - No early parsing of RMR node info and is only parsed at the
>>>      time of use.
>>>    - Changes to the RMR get/put API format compared to the
>>>      previous version.
>>>    - Support for RMR descriptor shared by multiple stream IDs.
>>>
>>> Please take a look and let me know your thoughts.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameer
>>> [0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/ed/
>> I still have a question on the IORT E.d spec (unrelated to this series).
>>
>> The spec mandates that if RMR nodes are presented in the IORT,
>> _DSM function #5 for the PCIe host bridge ACPI device object must return
>> 0, indicating the OS must honour the PCI config that the FW computed at
>> boot time.
>>
>> However implementing this _DSM #5 as above is known to prevent PCI
>> devices with IO ports from working, on aarch64 linux.
>>
>> "
>> The reason is that EFI creates I/O port mappings below
>>      0x1000 (in fact, at 0). However Linux, for legacy reasons, does not
>>      support I/O ports <= 0x1000 on PCI, so the I/O assignment
>> created by EFI
>>      is rejected.
>>          EFI creates the mappings primarily for itself, and up until
>> DSM #5
>>      started to be enforced, all PCI resource allocations that
>> existed at
>>      boot were ignored by Linux and recreated from scratch.
>> "
>>
>> This is an excerpt of a qemu commit message that reverted the _DMS #5
>> change (Revert "acpi/gpex: Inform os to keep firmware resource map").
>> Has the situation changed since July 2021 (ie. has UEFI been reworked?).
>> [+ Ard]
>
> FWIW I wasn't aware of that, but if it's an issue then it will need to
> be fixed in Linux or UEFI's PCI resource code (arguably if UEFI has
> already allocated from the bottom of I/O space then Linux should be
> safe to assume that there are no legacy PC I/O resources to worry
> about). The DSM is required to prevent bus numbers being reassigned,
> because if that happens then any PCI StreamIDs referenced in IORT may
> suddenly become meaningless and the association of root complex nodes
> and RMRs to physical hardware lost.

Thank you for confirming and explaining the need for DSM #5. Ard, please
could you confirm that the incompatibility with PCI devices with IO
ports is still there?

Eric

>
> Robin.
>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210805160319.GB23085@lpieralisi/
>>>
>>>  From old:
>>> We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
>>> fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these
>>> controllers make use of host memory for various caching related
>>> purposes and when SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to
>>> access these memory regions as there is no mapping for them.
>>> IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to describe and report these
>>> memory regions so that the kernel can make a unity mapping for
>>> these in SMMU.
>>>
>>> Change History:
>>>
>>> v6 --> v7
>>>   -fix pointed out by Steve to the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install in
>>> patch #8.
>>>
>>> v5 --> v6
>>> - Addressed comments from Robin & Lorenzo.
>>>    : Moved iort_parse_rmr() to acpi_iort_init() from
>>>      iort_init_platform_devices().
>>>    : Removed use of struct iort_rmr_entry during the initial
>>>      parse. Using struct iommu_resv_region instead.
>>>    : Report RMR address alignment and overlap errors, but continue.
>>>    : Reworked arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() (patch # 6).
>>> - Updated SMMUv2 bypass SMR code. Thanks to Jon N (patch #8).
>>> - Set IOMMU protection flags(IOMMU_CACHE, IOMMU_MMIO) based
>>>    on Type of RMR region. Suggested by Jon N.
>>>
>>> v4 --> v5
>>>   -Added a fw_data union to struct iommu_resv_region and removed
>>>    struct iommu_rmr (Based on comments from Joerg/Robin).
>>>   -Added iommu_put_rmrs() to release mem.
>>>   -Thanks to Steve for verifying on SMMUv2, but not added the Tested-by
>>>    yet because of the above changes.
>>>
>>> v3 -->v4
>>> -Included the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install changes suggested by
>>>   Steve(patch #7)
>>> -As per Robin's comments, RMR reserve implementation is now
>>>   more generic  (patch #8) and dropped v3 patches 8 and 10.
>>> -Rebase to 5.13-rc1
>>>
>>> RFC v2 --> v3
>>>   -Dropped RFC tag as the ACPICA header changes are now ready to be
>>>    part of 5.13[0]. But this series still has a dependency on that
>>> patch.
>>>   -Added IORT E.b related changes(node flags, _DSM function 5 checks
>>> for
>>>    PCIe).
>>>   -Changed RMR to stream id mapping from M:N to M:1 as per the spec and
>>>    discussion here[1].
>>>   -Last two patches add support for SMMUv2(Thanks to Jon Nettleton!)
>>>
>>> Jon Nettleton (1):
>>>    iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
>>>
>>> Shameer Kolothum (10):
>>>    ACPI/IORT: Add temporary RMR node flag definitions
>>>    iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
>>>    ACPI/IORT: Add helper functions to parse RMR nodes
>>>    iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
>>>    ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions
>>>    iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
>>>    iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force
>>>      bypass
>>>    iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
>>>    iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
>>>    iommu/arm-smmu: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
>>>
>>>   drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 305
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c |  91 ++++--
>>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c       |  65 ++++-
>>>   drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  25 ++
>>>   include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |  14 +
>>>   include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |  14 +
>>>   include/linux/iommu.h                       |   9 +
>>>   7 files changed, 504 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21 15:43 [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] ACPI/IORT: Add temporary RMR node flag definitions Shameer Kolothum
2022-03-22 19:31   ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region Shameer Kolothum
2022-03-22 18:27   ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-23 15:55     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] ACPI/IORT: Add helper functions to parse RMR nodes Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-24 10:13   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-25 17:31     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-03-10 10:32   ` Eric Auger
2022-03-10 10:45     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-23 18:05   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-03-22 19:08   ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-23 16:06     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-03-25 17:49       ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force bypass Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR Shameer Kolothum
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2022-03-22 19:12   ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-21 15:43 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] iommu/arm-smmu: " Shameer Kolothum
2022-03-03 10:37 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Steven Price
2022-03-03 13:02   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-03-11  8:06 ` Eric Auger
2022-03-11 13:23   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-03-11  8:19 ` Eric Auger
2022-03-11 10:34   ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-14 10:37     ` Eric Auger [this message]
2022-03-14 10:43       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-14 11:30         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-03-15 17:53 ` Eric Auger
2022-03-17 15:30   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0cde239c-8d30-33a8-6e5b-792e30e20462@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).