From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: Delete Qualcomm crypto engine driver
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 16:31:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e214da9-4152-4829-83b7-7e3fe78824b5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d97382a6-6c5d-4a3f-89cc-3ae9b432de3f@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1919 bytes --]
On 5/24/26 16:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/05/2026 22:12, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 5/24/26 12:42, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 03:03:56PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> It's slower than the generic C code and causes problems.
>>>
>>> Which problems?
>>
>> See https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260522024912.GC5937@quark/.
>
> Your commit is still incomplete and other people's opinion is poor
> reason. If you do not know what to write, ask that person to make
> necessary changes.
>
> Not mentioning that removing driver is not even necessary to achieve the
> goal Eric was mentioning and if I understood correctly: you are removing
> even the pieces Eric found useful.
>
>>
>> Also, if there are no systems in which the QCE driver is actually
>> the highest priority, then unless someone adjusts priorities manually
>> it's unused code.
>
> That's not a reason to remove a driver.
>
>
>>
>>> Also in the security world faster and safer are two orthogonal axis with
>>> very limited correlation.
>>
>> If by "safer" you mean protection against physical side-channel
>> attacks, then my understanding is that all operations on secret keys
>> need to be masked. This includes copying and storage.
>>
>> Linux only supports this for protected keys, and even then sometimes
>> uses the kernel's own RNG for key generation. There is no support
>> for using the QCE for protected keys.
>>
>> Linux does support using hardware-wrapped keys with inline crypto
>> engines, which are what are actually used on Android.
>
> Patches are discussed for some time, did you miss that?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thanks for the useful explanation. I'll remove this patch from my
tree and won't resend it.
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 7253 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-23 19:03 [PATCH 0/2] Delete the Qualcomm crypto engine Demi Marie Obenour via B4 Relay
2026-05-23 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] devicetree: Mark QCE bindings as deprecated Demi Marie Obenour via B4 Relay
[not found] ` <20260523-delete-qce-v1-1-86105cd7f406@gmail.com>
2026-05-24 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] crypto: Delete Qualcomm crypto engine driver Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-05-24 20:12 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-05-24 20:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-24 20:31 ` Demi Marie Obenour [this message]
2026-05-24 20:45 ` Eric Biggers
2026-05-25 6:29 ` Kuldeep Singh
2026-05-25 7:49 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-05-25 8:11 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-05-25 11:10 ` Kuldeep Singh
2026-05-30 10:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-24 20:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e214da9-4152-4829-83b7-7e3fe78824b5@gmail.com \
--to=demiobenour@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thara.gopinath@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox