From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.torgue@st.com (Alexandre Torgue) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:28:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] STM32: Fixes for 4.19 cycle In-Reply-To: References: <1537461257-2940-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <20180923123438.kyvxpeqq6q6xo6cs@localhost> Message-ID: <0f424a8e-67e0-cdc2-0276-660e455e3df6@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof On 09/24/2018 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Alexandre Torgue > wrote: >> Hi Olof >> >> On 09/23/2018 02:34 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alexandre, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 06:34:15PM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Arnd, olof and Kevin >>>> >>>> Those 2 patches fixe the same issue on 4.19-rc: a bad usage of the mdma >>>> binding inside stm32mp157c.dts file. Can you please add them as fixe for >>>> 4.19 ? >>> >>> >>> The patches only mention removing unused property contents, not what the >>> bug is >>> that it fixes (or if it's even causing any problems). Care you clarify? >> >> >> Sure. >> Concerning SPI patch: without this patch, DMA request will fail but there >> will be no crash because SPI will switch in interrupt mode. >> Concerning HASH one, it's just to align DT with dt-bindings documentation. >> Regarding the minor issue that they fix I could understand that you postpone >> the merge of those two patches for 4.20. > > The former sounds like an appropriate fix, but the latter is probably > 4.20 material, indeed. > > Should I just cherry-pick the two patches, or do you want to re-stage > new branches? I have nothing else to send for v4.20 so if you can directly take those two patches for v4.20, I agree. thanks alex > > > -Olof >