From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:52:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Add secure firmware support
In-Reply-To: <3879194.hz9mrTmL6z@amdc1227>
References: <1351178560-19188-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
 <006501cdc0a8$d880c990$89825cb0$%kim@samsung.com>
 <20121112095530.GF28327@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <3879194.hz9mrTmL6z@amdc1227>
Message-ID: <0f5d01cdc87d$e7c81890$b75849b0$%kim@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 
> On Monday 12 of November 2012 09:55:30 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 04:39:28PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > (+ Russell King)
> >
> > I think there's still an amount of work to do here; it's not a generic
> > interface at the moment because it makes some assumptions about how
> > things are done (eg, it assumes that there _will_ be a CPU boot
> > register; that is not always true.
> >
> > Moreover, the 'cpu' arguments given seem to be uncertain whether they're
> > logical CPU numbers or physical CPU numbers.
> >
> > Lastly, where is this interface actually documented?  It's just a bunch
> > of code _without_ _any_ documentation.  That means people will interpret
> > it differently, and it'll get used differently from platform to
> > platform.
> >
> > Let's have some documentation on this.
> 
> Right, I will include documentation in next version of this patchset.
> 
Any updates on this?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.